czardas Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 (edited) I wonder about this: should the fact that AutoIt does, or does not, parse some particular code be the defining criteria for syntax errors? I feel uncomfortable with that idea: because it seems happy-go-lucky - rather than by design. The example trancexx posted appears to work as intended and is (therefore) neither fluke nor coincidence. I believe such flexibility in syntax greatly enriches the language. Edited June 27, 2014 by czardas operator64 ArrayWorkshop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Robertson Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 There are plenty of internally defined features that get discovered but if they are never announced as a finished feature in a release, you should not count on it as continued behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trancexx Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 ^^This isn't one of them. ♡♡♡ . eMyvnE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now