50 replies to this topic

[ligenza]

If 1 != 2 Then
EndIf

Why not?

I have to do this instead

If Not (1 = 2) Then
EndIf

Or this

If 1 <> 2 Then
EndIf

Maybe I'm missing something.

Edited by ligenza, 29 September 2005 - 02:33 PM.

[w0uter]

!= = <>

lol, it looks like a shovel

Edited by w0uter, 29 September 2005 - 01:36 PM.

[ligenza]

!= = <>

lol, it looks like a shovel

!= works...?

[w0uter]

AFAIK <> is the same as !=

[this-is-me]

@wouter, yes, it is. The statement means less than and greater than, which means it can't be the same.

[ligenza]

@wouter, yes, it is. The statement means less than and greater than, which means it can't be the same.

;If 1 != 2 Then MsgBox(0, "!=", ""); Generates an error
If 1 <> 2 Then MsgBox(0, "<>", ""); Works

Why can't I have both..? I think .NET allows the use of either or.

[w0uter]

why WANT both ?

[this-is-me]

I have the same question. It is a total of 2 keys to learn on the keyboard. Why have another operator?

[CyberSlug]

;If 1 != 2 Then MsgBox(0, "!=", ""); Generates an error
If 1 <> 2 Then MsgBox(0, "<>", ""); Works

Why can't I have both..? I think .NET allows the use of either or.

Because "AutoIt v3 is a freeware BASIC-like scripting language...." and BASIC uses <> as the not-equals operator.

Maybe the devs think it's a slippery slope. If someone wants !=, then someone else will want the ability to use ! instead of the NOT keyword.....

[ligenza]

Because "AutoIt v3 is a freeware BASIC-like scripting language...." and BASIC uses <> as the not-equals operator.

Maybe the devs think it's a slippery slope. If someone wants !=, then someone else will want the ability to use ! instead of the NOT keyword.....

Allow users to create their own operators then like in .NET. It's the spirit of open source to give people OPTIONS. I've used <> and != for years so it's not a big issue. The community mentality here is.

[w0uter]

omg omg i want ! to be not.

[ligenza]

omg omg i want ! to be not.

me 2 !

[Lazycat]

Allow users to create their own operators then like in .NET. It's the spirit of open source to give people OPTIONS. I've used <> and != for years so it's not a big issue. The community mentality here is.

Oh yes. Own operators. This cool. I can't live without ten or eleven operators that do one thing. Yeah.
Do you noticed about .NET framework size? And it's speed? Do you want that Autoit come this way? I'm not

[ligenza]

Oh yes. Own operators. This cool. I can't live without ten or eleven operators that do one thing. Yeah.
Do you noticed about .NET framework size? And it's speed? Do you want that Autoit come this way? I'm not

... you know not what you speak. .NET is a million things AutoIt will never be so don't fear of making it a usefull language.

[w0uter]

(i so hope you get a ban from the forums for posting like that)

if .net is so usefull.
why dont you go use it and leave ?

Edited by w0uter, 29 September 2005 - 08:00 PM.

[ligenza]

(i so hope you get a ban from the forums for posting like that)

if .net is so usefull.
why dont you go use it and leave ?

Because there are tards like you that make the forum so entertaining! Playing around with AutoIt has not had an impact on my .NET coding.

[Insolence]

.NET IS so useful, this idea is just coming from someone on the other side of the tracks, without a background in BASIC.

Ligenza, simple fact of the matter is <> goes along with the BASIC style everyone is already useful. Version 4 will hopefully move to a bracketed language (is that what you call 'em?) and accept operators as such.

Until then, welcome to the forum. Feel free to let w0uter off easily this time, he just doesn't realize the power of .NET

[ligenza]

.NET IS so useful, this idea is just coming from someone on the other side of the tracks, without a background in BASIC.

Ligenza, simple fact of the matter is <> goes along with the BASIC style everyone is already useful. Version 4 will hopefully move to a bracketed language (is that what you call 'em?) and accept operators as such.

Until then, welcome to the forum. Feel free to let w0uter off easily this time, he just doesn't realize the power of .NET

Okay, only for you though.

[w0uter]

java > .net

atleast thats what my teacher says


i remember (something like) this

autoit is a scripting language, not a coding language

[ligenza]

java > .net

atleast thats what my teacher says
i remember (something like) this

Those who can't, teach.

.net > java