t0ddie Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share Posted September 7, 2006 (edited) i disagree. the reasons for making a random password each time are obvious. if someone gets one pass, they will not have access to all of your passworded things. @mhz when you choose no decompile option, there is still a passphrase.. and you dont know it. so thats giving someone permission to decompile it? uh.. i dont see your logic. there IS a valid use for it. but who the fuck even CARES if i use it. this topic had nothing to do with that. i wasnt promoting or asking help with it. i use it for my own reasons and had just MENTIONED using it. if you dont need it for the same reasons that i do your more thean welcome to NOT USE IT. @vaglik LOL @helge im not shitting on anyone. thank you very much. @anyone who wants to tell me different fuck you very much. Edited September 7, 2006 by t0ddie Valik Note Added 19 October 2006 - 08:38 AMAdded to warn level I just plain don't like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valik Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 i disagree.the reasons for making a random password each time are obvious.if someone gets one pass, they will not have access to all of your passworded things.@mhz when you choose no decompile option, there is still a passphrase.. and you dont know it.so thats giving someone permission to decompile it? uh.. i dont see your logic.there IS a valid use for it.but who the fuck even CARES if i use it. this topic had nothing to do with that.i wasnt promoting or asking help with it. i use it for my own reasons and had just MENTIONED using it.if you dont need it for the same reasons that i do your more thean welcome to NOT USE IT.@vaglik LOL@helge im not shitting on anyone.thank you very much.@anyone who wants to tell me differentfuck you very much.Oooh, he's at the profanity stage now. This is when things get exceedingly fun. Or when they end. Either way, good times are ahead for (almost) all.Somehow, I'm not surprised MHz's point was lost on The Idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryFrost Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Hey Robin, Batman and Joker are at it again.....http://www.autoitscript.com/fileman/users/gafrost/POW.JPG SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHz Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 i disagree.the reasons for making a random password each time are obvious.if someone gets one pass, they will not have access to all of your passworded things.The logic failed there. You cannot decompile any of them either, right? Unless you hack their's...opps yours Heck, seems like as described earlier that you do not even seem to know your own code to fix it.If you can remember random passphases with each compile, then your the smartest person in this whole forum (batteries logic not included). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vim Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Sometimes people like drama , to be "on stage", "stir up the pot". If you drop the rope, sort of speaking, in tug-a-war;who's left? Silence may be the best reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now