The number 4096 can burn in hell.

[Valik]

I swear to whatever gods may or may not exist that the next motherfucker who tries to submit a UDF with a hard-coded buffer size is going to get stabbed 4096 times with a rusted butter knife. Here's a hint: If you're writing code with a fixed buffer size instead of dynamically calculating the buffer size, you are a failure as a programmer and a lazy programmer and need to go find a beach to bury yourself in at low tide.

I just used grepWin to search the "Include" directory and it finds 100 instances of "4096". Fucking ridiculous.

[Jon]

It's like the AutoIt source with the number 32768

(Although there is less of it now )

[Zedna]

Here is the link to related Track ticket #1336

http://www.autoitscript.com/trac/autoit/ticket/1336

Edited December 9, 2009 by Zedna

[Valik]

"Om nom nom"

You hear that? It's the universe eating itself because of the circular reference posting that link has introduced.

[Zedna]

"Om nom nom"

You hear that? It's the universe eating itself because of the circular reference posting that link has introduced.

I'm not very good in English :-( so I don't understand exactly.

But feel free to remove my above post if you don't like it.

I know there is link from Trac to forum but I added link in reverse order from forum to Trac for those people don't reading Track only forum.

Edited December 9, 2009 by Zedna

[monoceres]

I'm not very good in English :-( so I don't understand exactly.

But feel free to remove my above post if you don't like it.

I know there is link from Trac to forum but I added link in reverse order from forum to Trac for those people don't reading Track only forum.

Recursion

Edited December 9, 2009 by monoceres

[Valik]

Recursion

I will give you +10 rep if you can do that without editing.

[monoceres]

Recursion Edited December 9, 2009 by monoceres

[Valik]

Fail. Nice try, though. Please don't keep trying.

Edit: Oh no you don't. Post restored so everyone can see your failure.

Edited December 9, 2009 by Valik

[monoceres]

If czardas haden't post in another topic it would've worked

Edited December 9, 2009 by monoceres

[monoceres]

meh, edited wrong post.

Edit: Restored fail.

Edited December 9, 2009 by monoceres

[czardas]

If czardas haden't post in another topic it would've worked

I was wondering about that. I thought there was something wrong with Firefox.

[jvanegmond]

I found a bug

[Valik]

I found a bug

Which is what?

[jvanegmond]

Look at the post order numbers on the top right side of each post.

[Valik]

Meh, a cosmetic issue.

[czardas]

Meh, a cosmetic issue.

This post has been edited by czardas. Yesterday 11.33PM.

Edited December 9, 2009 by czardas

[jvanegmond]

Bravo on the banning show.

Edit: Maybe stuff like this is usually in the Chat forum for a reason.

Edited December 10, 2009 by Manadar

[jchd]

Leaving out "Klein's URLs" and getting closer to the topic subject, is there any hope the AutoIt statement line size limitation could get removed or at least significantly increased?

I ask because there seem to be no way to initialize a medium-size array without hitting this limitation. A good example that did bite me hard is when I tried to use AutoIt to double-check some Unicode tries [for a SQLite extension].

I had a number of :

Local $unicode_fold_indexes[$UNICODE_FOLD_INDEXES_SIZE] = [ _

0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 3, 0, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, _

11, 12, 13, 14, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 16, 17, 18, _

19, 20, 21, 22, 0, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 0, 0, _

...

]

and

Local $unicode_fold_data_table[$UNICODE_FOLD_BLOCK_COUNT][$UNICODE_FOLD_BLOCK_SIZE] = [ _

[ 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF ], _

[ 0xFFFF, 0x0061, 0x0062, 0x0063, 0x0064, 0x0065, 0x0066, 0x0067, 0x0068, 0x0069, 0x006A, 0x006B, 0x006C, 0x006D, 0x006E, 0x006F, 0x0070, 0x0071, 0x0072, 0x0073, 0x0074, 0x0075, 0x0076, 0x0077, 0x0078, 0x0079, 0x007A, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF ], _

...

]

all exceeding the silly 4000 characters limit, and by far.

[Valik]

I can think of ways to remove that limitation but they aren't really trivial to implement. The trivial ways to implement it all impact performance. The reason a static line size is used is so that constant allocations and deallocations don't occur.