Jump to content

Automatic convert old scripts to V3.3.2.0


Recommended Posts

In a word, NO.

You would have to script a parser to go through every line of a script, finding everything mentioned in the change logs between 3.3.0.0 and 3.3.2.0 and correctly change it (i.e. AdLibRegister() vice AdLibEnable()).

Sounds very painful, but hey, that's why you make the big scripting bucks!

:mellow:

Valuater's AutoIt 1-2-3, Class... Is now in Session!For those who want somebody to write the script for them: RentACoder"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might also want to read this.

http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=70902

George

Question about decompiling code? Read the decompiling FAQ and don't bother posting the question in the forums.

Be sure to read and follow the forum rules. -AKA the AutoIt Reading and Comprehension Skills test.***

The PCRE (Regular Expression) ToolKit for AutoIT - (Updated Oct 20, 2011 ver:3.0.1.13) - Please update your current version before filing any bug reports. The installer now includes both 32 and 64 bit versions. No change in version number.

Visit my Blog .. currently not active but it will soon be resplendent with news and views. Also please remove any links you may have to my website. it is soon to be closed and replaced with something else.

"Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would have to script a parser to go through every line of a script, finding everything mentioned in the change logs between 3.3.0.0 and 3.3.2.0 and correctly change it (i.e. AdLibRegister() vice AdLibEnable()).

A simpler workaround is a script (or just a batchfile) which allows you to select the compiler for a given job. Another way to do this (on NTFS) is to define an "autoit" junction which points to the required interpreter/compiler, and change this as required. That way, the debugging tools should work pretty-much the same for each.

I'm still using 3.2 for some work. Mainly because some of the effects are subtle, and a version-change calls-for a VERY thorough retest to make sure there aren't obscure problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...