Jump to content

How to sum with word


Recommended Posts

i'm newbie here, i need to know how i want make a sum with same word .

example : i have 2 serial number JAE11111111(P) and JAE22222222(F).

my project here how i want make a yields refer from the serial number.

Total Test = 2

total Pass = 1

total fail = 1

yields = ?

regards

pastisucess

http://asiavacationpackages.blogspot.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can test the strings with things like this:

Global $iTotal = 0, $iPass = 0, $iFail = 0
Global $aInputs[6] = ["JAE11111111(P)", "JAE22222222(F)", "JAE12345678(P)", "JAE87654321(F)", "JAE02468024(P)", "JAE13579135(P)"]

For $n = 0 To UBound($aInputs) - 1
    $iTotal += 1
    Select
        Case StringInStr($aInputs[$n], "(P)")
            $iPass += 1
        Case StringInStr($aInputs[$n], "(F)")
            $iFail += 1
    EndSelect
Next

MsgBox(64, "Results", "Total Count = " & $iTotal & @CRLF & _
        "Passed = " & $iPass & @CRLF & _
        "Failed = " & $iFail)

Here, the inputs are just strings in an array, and the totals are generated by just looping through the array. I have no idea what you mean by "Yields", and just assumed "(P)" or "(F)" are the only indicator of pass/fail.

You might also put it in a function and call it as required, this way:

Global $iTotal = 0, $iPass = 0, $iFail = 0
Global $aInputs[6] = ["JAE11111111(P)", "JAE22222222(F)", "JAE12345678(P)", "JAE87654321(F)", "JAE02468024(P)", "JAE13579135(P)"]

For $n = 0 To UBound($aInputs) - 1
    _CheckItem($aInputs[$n])
Next

MsgBox(64, "Results", "Total Count = " & $iTotal & @CRLF & _
        "Passed = " & $iPass & @CRLF & _
        "Failed = " & $iFail)

Func _CheckItem($sInput)
    $iTotal += 1
    Select
        Case StringInStr($sInput, "(P)")
            $iPass += 1
        Case StringInStr($sInput, "(F)")
            $iFail += 1
    EndSelect
EndFunc

:x

Edited by PsaltyDS
Valuater's AutoIt 1-2-3, Class... Is now in Session!For those who want somebody to write the script for them: RentACoder"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...