Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Hy AutoIters I have a Problem. I have an Array, which i want to fill with 9856 Entries. When I tell the Script to return those Entries it fails at the 4087th entry... I havent a code sample yet. Trying to reproduce. just asking. Caus maybe there is a Limit I don't know. I use tha latest Beta .55 Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 Looks like it isn't a problem of the Arrays, but from the _GUICtrlListview... UDFs... I try to reproduce them, and post some code... Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardCopy Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Looks like it isn't a problem of the Arrays, but from the _GUICtrlListview... UDFs...I try to reproduce them, and post some code...<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yup , you have guessed right , you have hit the limit for listview control 4096 items i understand.HardCopy ps to the devlopers of autoit - out of interest will this limit ever likely be overcome in a future release? Contributions: UDF _DateYearFirstChildren are like Farts, you can just about stand your own.Why am I not a Vegetarian?...Well...my ancestors didn't fight & evolve to the Top of the food chain for me to survive on Salad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryFrost Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Nothing wrong with the UDFs, should research limitations on controls in the GUI 4086 will be the limit for ListView. Gary SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 Nothing wrong with the UDFs, should research limitations on controls in the GUI4086 will be the limit for ListView.Gary<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why only so few? Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryFrost Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Yup , you have guessed right , you have hit the limit for listview control 4096 items i understand.HardCopy ps to the devlopers of autoit - out of interest will this limit ever likely be overcome in a future release?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Probably not, unless they quit supporting 95 and 98Gary SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 Who need them anyway? Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryFrost Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 You would be supprised as to how many people still have them, I had to force them to quit supporting 95 and 98 where I work, and pretty soon I'll have to do the same for 2K. Gary SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 And an OS Detection which breaks this limit is also no possible? Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
layer Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 And an OS Detection which breaks this limit is also no possible?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I was thinking the same thing but if it hasn't been done yet, theres probablly a good explination as to why. FootbaG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raindancer Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 I'd like to hear that... Say: "Chuchichäschtli"My UDFs:_PrintImage UDF_WinAnimate UDFGruess Raindancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutster Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 We want to support all versions of 32 bit (or better) Windows, that is Win95, Win98, WinME, as well as the NT engined OS's: NT, 2000, 2003, XP. We want scripts to be able to run without modification from one OS to another. So what runs on XP should run on 98 as well. That being said, we could add a check to determine the size based on OS and then the scripter would have to check to make sure that OS can actually handle this large an array. If somebody writes a script on XP and I run it on my Win98 machine, then when the ListView blows up becuase the array contains 6000 elements, I complain that the script does not work. I guess that the decision was made to pick the minimum consistant behaviour to avoid this type of scenario. David NuttallNuttall Computer Consulting An Aquarius born during the Age of Aquarius AutoIt allows me to re-invent the wheel so much faster. I'm off to write a wizard, a wonderful wizard of odd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photonbuddy Posted October 9, 2005 Share Posted October 9, 2005 Just wondering if there has been any re-think on this? I spent an hour or so today trying to figure out why my script wasn't working. At least I found the reason without much searching Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now