Nuffilein805 Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 ok, i managed to find the error in the code took me some time, but now i (hopefully) fixed it if you still encouter an error: tell me! updated the file in the first post my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators SmOke_N Posted October 31, 2005 Moderators Share Posted October 31, 2005 Nice Job Nuff!, I'm looking over it now intently, but tested most everything and it's encoding and decoding nicely. Common sense plays a role in the basics of understanding AutoIt... If you're lacking in that, do us all a favor, and step away from the computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 Nice Job Nuff!, I'm looking over it now intently, but tested most everything and it's encoding and decoding nicely.took me kinda forever to make it run this wayi hope there are no more bugs in itthx for the positive feedback my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0uter Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 seeing as this uses ascii code would it be posssible that the output contains a NULL char ? My UDF's:;mem stuff_Mem;ftp stuff_FTP ( OLD );inet stuff_INetGetSource ( OLD )_INetGetImage _INetBrowse ( Collection )_EncodeUrl_NetStat_Google;random stuff_iPixelSearch_DiceRoll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 the key can contain a NULL char, but that doesn't matter (it sometimes contains @crlf as well) included an errorcorrection (well its just checking if its encrypted properly) my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0uter Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 i thought autoitstrings are NULL terminated .... so you would have an halfly encrpyted string. My UDF's:;mem stuff_Mem;ftp stuff_FTP ( OLD );inet stuff_INetGetSource ( OLD )_INetGetImage _INetBrowse ( Collection )_EncodeUrl_NetStat_Google;random stuff_iPixelSearch_DiceRoll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 thats why i included the error-correction, which avoids this problem have you already tried it out? my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0uter Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 nope. i got no need for it since evrything i make is for fun and i opensource it btw sorry i never sayd goodjob, so here it is: goodjob. My UDF's:;mem stuff_Mem;ftp stuff_FTP ( OLD );inet stuff_INetGetSource ( OLD )_INetGetImage _INetBrowse ( Collection )_EncodeUrl_NetStat_Google;random stuff_iPixelSearch_DiceRoll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 thx, if you say this, this is so great (theres no crying smilie) my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koder Posted November 1, 2005 Share Posted November 1, 2005 (edited) Not to nitpick... maybe a little, but this is not encryption, it's encoding. ROT13/ Base64 are a common encoding algorithms.. DES or Blowfish are types of encryption. The difference is that something that is encoded can be cracked just by knowing the algorithm while encryption can not be cracked with the just the algorithm (not that some don't have big holes). I have a similar encoding algorithm based on ROT13 and it rotates based on a password, it becomes increasingly more complex as the password increases in size but given enough time it could be easily cracked by hand. Edited November 2, 2005 by Koder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted November 1, 2005 Author Share Posted November 1, 2005 this 1 shouldn't be cracked (1-time-pad) key is as long as the text to be encrypted mathmetical you can't crack it, cause it could be everything if the key is about (lets say) 20 of length and the text is 100 than you can easily crack it but if the keylength is 100 as the textlength then there is no way finding the right solution as i posted a little bit up, you'll have unlimited possibilities my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dicemaster Slayer Posted November 1, 2005 Share Posted November 1, 2005 Never really looked into the tiniest bits and pieces of the code, mostly because I'm still learning the language, so most of the 1-time-pad and such flies over my head, but I do see where Koder can come from. As the password increases in length, obviously it will get more and more secure, as there is more to bruteforce, etc. As I understand it, typical bruteforce attacks will start at one end of a list of possible passwords and try every last combination until something works. From what I can gather, the 1-time-pad and rotating password functions noted here could be enhanced if they could wrap back around at some point, a while after a brute force attempt has tried it. A script I made a while ago takes various macros from the system clock and strings them together, and then reverses them. It makes for a pretty secure system, provided whoever is trying to crack it doesn't know it. Every minute, the password, made entirely of numbers, would increase by one trillion in number sense, and every ten minutes it would wrap back to the start, cycling from 100 billion to 9 trillion in a short span. From what I know, which might not be much, about brute force attacks, one it's tried a combination, it won't try it again. So if it takes a minute to increase its attempt from 1 to one million, then the code has already gone far ahead of the attempts. Once it gets all the way up to the full code, then it would have to try all possible combinations within ten minutes before the password cycles again, and this is assuming it knows the password is only numbers. If it goes for an alphanumeric, then it's almost certain that it will never, or at least take a long time to, crack the code. Just a bit of long speculation on increasing the strength of this already wonderful script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuffilein805 Posted November 4, 2005 Author Share Posted November 4, 2005 just thought about your suggestion, but what i don't understand how do you want to decrypt it after you encrypted it? if you're always changing the password (or am i getting it totally wrong) how can it be decompiled (if i would use this, i'd just do it in a totally new script - then depending on creation-time, -date, creator, ...) anyways thx for the suggestion my little chatmy little encryption toolmy little hidermy unsafe clickbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yehia Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 i like this way but the old script can encrypt but gives error with decryption and the second one just hangs sorry for getting this to top again but can anyone fix it? My Scripts:IE New UDFsElastic images moving under mouse (with a happy valentine's example)_FileRemoveLine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfWorld Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Cracking wait XD!!! love this! Lol this is like... you split a string in to 2 then if you don't have the other one but you got one then the string would be incomplete! So this is very hard to crack (Yes I mean it) But am sorry to tell you that this miss lead the point of password completely because you will need to send both of the find on way or the other. But anyway its a very good system you wrote! Edited February 22, 2009 by athiwatc Main project - Eat Spaghetti - Obfuscate and Optimize your script. The most advance add-on.Website more of GadGets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) @nuffilein805 Very nice stuff Woow ! Ive decrypted the password of the Nasa ! Cheers, FireFox. Edited February 22, 2009 by FireFox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jennico Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 (edited) hmmmm - funny, the original included example text does not work, but customs do. i would prefer an encryption that hides the original textlength....... but well done so far. j. edit: well, not so funny. the program fails on long texts (longer than about 20 chars) - recursion level error. this is too bad. can anyone link me to a better working autoit algorithm ? j. Edited February 28, 2009 by jennico Spoiler I actively support Wikileaks | Freedom for Julian Assange ! | Defend freedom of speech ! | Fight censorship ! | I will not silence.Don't forget this IP: 213.251.145.96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now