Jump to content

The Official Obfuscator?


Recommended Posts

Yes, I am still using it. I am modifying the output as well, since I found it to be the best obfuscator available. 
So question: If I use Execute() with no variable, no UDFs in there, for example Execute(StringToBinary("Stringhere")) then it will still work right?
I tested it and it does work for me. Just want to make sure

And if the use of the good ol' obfuscator is disallowed, please delete this thread, staffs. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Developers

There is no official Obfuscator and there has never been one, only the one I have supported, but that support has ended a while back.
Not sure why one still would want to use it. :) 

As to your question: Yes it will work as you already found out with your tests. 

Jos

SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource   Forum etiquette  Forum Rules 
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jos said:

There is no official Obfuscator and there has never been one, only the one I have supported, but that support has ended a while back.
Not sure why one still would want to use it. :) 

As to your question: Yes it will work as you already found out with your tests. 

Jos

 

Lel I still have the binary for version 1.0.30.1

If you still have the binary for a later version, please PM me the download. I wouldn't mind updating my protection toolkit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...