Zedna Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 (edited) Versions/Sizes: 123: 418 816 122: 396 800 ... 110: 391 168 So in version 123 was made big jump in size, but there are no new functions, only few fixes (from 122). So question is: Is it right or some problem? If it's OK and it was only my misunderstanding of something then sorry... Edited May 8, 2006 by Zedna Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0uter Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Jon put spyware in it to cover the hosting. maby there just big bugfixes ? My UDF's:;mem stuff_Mem;ftp stuff_FTP ( OLD );inet stuff_INetGetSource ( OLD )_INetGetImage _INetBrowse ( Collection )_EncodeUrl_NetStat_Google;random stuff_iPixelSearch_DiceRoll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 I correct 2 missing dot in message string and I get and update that lead to this increment. Will be back in .124 Thanks Zedna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted May 26, 2006 Author Share Posted May 26, 2006 Same problem (as with version 123) is now with version 125. Only some fixes and size grow very much. Versions/Sizes: 125: 419 328 124: 397 824 123: 418 816 Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted July 27, 2006 Author Share Posted July 27, 2006 Same problem (as with version 125) is now with version 132. Only some fixes and size grow very much. But maybe Compilation done with VC8 instead of VC6. (by Jon) could be source of this ... Versions/Sizes: 132: 444 416 131: 399 360 130: 399 360 Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Same problem (as with version 125) is now with version 132.Only some fixes and size grow very much.But maybe Compilation done with VC8 instead of VC6. (by Jon) could be source of this ...Versions/Sizes:132: 444 416131: 399 360130: 399 360It look like the VC8 is bringing some more stuff. Compiling with VC6 will have done the same size as before.But it is a Dev Team decision to go with VC8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted July 28, 2006 Author Share Posted July 28, 2006 It look like the VC8 is bringing some more stuff. Compiling with VC6 will have done the same size as before.But it is a Dev Team decision to go with VC8 OK. I have no problem with this - if bigger size is not due to some "error". Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted July 28, 2006 Administrators Share Posted July 28, 2006 The compiler we've used for releases to date is Visual C++ 6 but that's like 8+ years old now and is very "loose" with the C++ standard it's years since it was updated. Quite often we've had to write code in a bizarre way so that it will even compile in VC6. Most of the devs have been using Visual C++ 2003 and recently 2005 for dev work as it's a much more compliant compiler and nicer environment. It's annoying about the size difference though. :grr: Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSThePatriot Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 @Zedna I am glad this community has people like you. I would never have known the size difference, or thought to check it. Thanks for your dedication to the community. JS AutoIt Links File-String Hash Plugin Updated! 04-02-2008 Plugins have been discontinued. I just found out. ComputerGetInfo UDF's Updated! 11-23-2006 External Links Vortex Revolutions Engineer / Inventor (Web, Desktop, and Mobile Applications, Hardware Gizmos, Consulting, and more) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbhkamal Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 The compiler we've used for releases to date is Visual C++ 6 but that's like 8+ years old now and is very "loose" with the C++ standard it's years since it was updated. Quite often we've had to write code in a bizarre way so that it will even compile in VC6. Most of the devs have been using Visual C++ 2003 and recently 2005 for dev work as it's a much more compliant compiler and nicer environment.It's annoying about the size difference though. :grr:Just one question,If you compile the same code twice (make no changes) do you get the same size?If not maybe there is a problem with the compiler, right?RK "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace"-Jimi Hendrix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted July 28, 2006 Administrators Share Posted July 28, 2006 Just one question,If you compile the same code twice (make no changes) do you get the same size?If not maybe there is a problem with the compiler, right?RKThe compiler's fine. It justs adds in lots more features (for example, inbuilt buffer overrun checking). Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Robertson Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 The size of the AutoIt bin file isn't too big. I think the script files ending up at about 40 kb compiled isn't too bad. It would be nice smaller, but this isn't bad yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jftuga Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Is there a way to tell VC8 to compile for a smaller size exe / dll? I imagine that if there were such an option, it would probably come at a cost of running slower. Just a thought - one of those size vs. speed tradoffs. -John Admin_Popup, show computer info or launch shellRemote Manager, facilitates connecting to RDP / VNCProc_Watch, reprioritize cpu intensive processesUDF: _ini_to_dict, transforms ini file entries into variablesUDF: monitor_resolutions, returns resolutions of multiple monitorsReport Computer Problem, for your IT help deskProfile Fixer, fixes a 'missing' AD user profile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valik Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 AutoIt has always been compiled with the "favor small size" optimization on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted November 16, 2006 Author Share Posted November 16, 2006 Same problem (as with version 3.1.1 beta 123,125,132) is now with version 3.2.1 beta 1,2. Only some fixes and size grow very much. Versions/Sizes: 3.2.1.12: 416 256 ... 3.2.1.2: 433 664 3.2.1.1: 381 440 3.2.0.1: 382 464 So in version 3.2.1.2 is much bigger size Jon said that new VC8 compiler was ued instead of old VC6 in version 3.1.1.132. So if all 3.2.x versions would have bigger size I would say nothing here. But why is bigger size in version 3.2.1.2? Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Robertson Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 More native support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developers Jos Posted November 17, 2006 Developers Share Posted November 17, 2006 The change of the regex libary has added some size... SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page - Beta files Read before posting How to post scriptsource Forum etiquette Forum Rules Live for the present, Dream of the future, Learn from the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted November 17, 2006 Author Share Posted November 17, 2006 (edited) The change of the regex libary has added some size...This was added in version 3.2.1.7 (and not in 3.2.1.2):- Added: StringRegExp() and StringRegExpReplace() regular expression support (Perl compatible) Edited November 17, 2006 by Zedna Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valik Posted November 17, 2006 Share Posted November 17, 2006 The size of 3.2.1.12 looks about right to me. It has the new regular expression engine which added some size. There's also some new code I added which increased AutoIt by around 5KB. So I think the size of 3.2.1.12 is about right when compared to 3.2.0.1 since we've knowing added some stuff to increase the size 25KB - 30KB. I see no significance in the size of 3.2.1.2 because that is 10 builds ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedna Posted November 17, 2006 Author Share Posted November 17, 2006 (edited) The size of 3.2.1.12 looks about right to me. It has the new regular expression engine which added some size. There's also some new code I added which increased AutoIt by around 5KB. So I think the size of 3.2.1.12 is about right when compared to 3.2.0.1 since we've knowing added some stuff to increase the size 25KB - 30KB. I see no significance in the size of 3.2.1.2 because that is 10 builds ago.3.2.1.2: 433 6643.2.1.1: 381 440RegExp wasn't added in this version (3.2.1.2), so why more than 52KB in this version?EDIT: OK I don't want to "tease" developers with such minor problem if they don't want to observe more details about that. So no problem. Edited November 17, 2006 by Zedna Resources UDF ResourcesEx UDF AutoIt Forum Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now