Holger Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 @Jon: in the current unstable installer in the "GUIConstants.au3" the $GUI_EVENT-values are wrong/old !!! Old project:GUI/Tray menu with icons and colors Other old stuff:IconFileScanner, TriState/ThreeState GUI TreeView, GUI ContextMenu created out of a TreeView Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted October 27, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted October 27, 2004 @Jon: in the current unstable installer in the "GUIConstants.au3" the $GUI_EVENT-values are wrong/old !!!Fixed.JP, check your GUIConstants Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Fixed.JP, check your GUIConstants <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Sorry, I know I was on the way to send you the update on the mouse stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted October 27, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted October 27, 2004 Minor update. - Fixed int64/double math - Fixed compiling under MinGW - Added DevC++ project files Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valik Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 I see that in the latest builds, the QFE has changed from 0. Glad to see that, it means identifying which beta version will be a lot easier, now. Jon, I guess this means my script worked okay, or did you find a (better) method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted October 29, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted October 29, 2004 I see that in the latest builds, the QFE has changed from 0. Glad to see that, it means identifying which beta version will be a lot easier, now.Jon, I guess this means my script worked okay, or did you find a (better) method?The script worked fine but it only changed the two numeric values in the RC file. There are also two string values - I tried it without these present and it just gave a bad version block. So I changed the way it works by creating a 4 line AutoIt_Version.h file that just has 4 defines for the relevant version numbers and than the RC file uses these variables rather than hardcoded strings. The .h file is automatically generated when I run my automated "full build" rather than on every compile. The current version number is stored in AutoIt_Version.ini and there is a switch in there to enable/disable auto update. Yes, I know I could have just updated your script but I was lazy Thanks Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valik Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Sorry, Jon, I could of saved you work if you would of told me this. I'd forgotten this, but I use .'s in my string versions. If you look on lines 158 and 160, you'll see this because the first parameter to __VersionUpdate() is "." instead of a ",". Simply changing that will cause it all to be updated properly. Its been so long since I wrote the script, I forgot about little details like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted October 29, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted October 29, 2004 Sorry, Jon, I could of saved you work if you would of told me this. I'd forgotten this, but I use .'s in my string versions. If you look on lines 158 and 160, you'll see this because the first parameter to __VersionUpdate() is "." instead of a ",". Simply changing that will cause it all to be updated properly. Its been so long since I wrote the script, I forgot about little details like that.No probs, by the time the timezone had come around I'd done it, it was only like a 5 line script after the changes above. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 1, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 1, 2004 Updated with some bug fixes from JP.http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/files/unstable/autoit Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josbe Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Updated with some bug fixes from JP.http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/files/unstable/autoit<{POST_SNAPBACK}>@Devs: To resize a icon with GUICtrlSetPos was a bug? I ask, because with this update, now the icons defined with 'GUICtrlCreateIcon' already aren't resizable?You can take a look with this script AUTOIT > AutoIt docs / Beta folder - AutoIt latest beta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 @Devs: To resize a icon with GUICtrlSetPos was a bug? I ask, because with this update, now the icons defined with 'GUICtrlCreateIcon' already aren't resizable?You can take a look with this script<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I think it was because the first GuiCtrlSetPos was not doing it's job. icon are displayed with the exact pixel of the definition of the icon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 1, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 1, 2004 Updated with ControlListView and doc page. All the control pages need updating really as the ClassnameNN thing is a bit out of date and I need to write a single page describing all the ways controls can be referenced and we can just point all the other pages to it. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 2, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 2, 2004 (edited) http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/files/unstable/autoitUpdated:- ViewChange and SelectInvert added to ControlListViewViewChange is XP only as there doesn't seem to be a pre-XP way to internally control this.Internal:Built-in and user function lookups are now done using a binary chop search. This is pretty cool as instead of having to search 300 function names you only have to search around 7 or 8 functions. This does mean that the order of functions in the list in script.cpp now has to be perfectly sorted otherwise it simply will not work. Be careful when adding new functions in there. (I thought the list was already sorted but GuiGetMsg was in the wrong place which caught me out ) Edited November 2, 2004 by Jon Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trids Posted November 2, 2004 Share Posted November 2, 2004 [..]ViewChange is XP only as there doesn't seem to be a pre-XP way to internally control this.[..]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Jon .. would this help at all? http://www.mvps.org/btmtz/listview/.. see the download on the page called setshellview1.zip: it's a VB app showing how to use some API calls that might be useful. Works nicely on NT4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 2, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 2, 2004 Jon .. would this help at all? http://www.mvps.org/btmtz/listview/.. see the download on the page called setshellview1.zip: it's a VB app showing how to use some API calls that might be useful. Works nicely on NT4 Looks promising, I'll have another play. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 2, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 2, 2004 Updated: Changed the ViewChange command to use "list", "details", "smallicons" and "largeicons". Works on 95/NT/2000 too. Fixed StringStripWS. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trids Posted November 3, 2004 Share Posted November 3, 2004 If you're still looking for feedback on DriveMap* functions...The more I fiddle with this script (in terms of the order of mapping!), the more flaky the results get:http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=5823.. of course, the weird results only seem to occur in the unlikely event of trying to map the same drive letter to different shares .. but still, very odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 4, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 4, 2004 If you're still looking for feedback on DriveMap* functions...The more I fiddle with this script (in terms of the order of mapping!), the more flaky the results get:http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=5823.. of course, the weird results only seem to occur in the unlikely event of trying to map the same drive letter to different shares .. but still, very odd The drivemap functions have been on the bug fix list for a while. It seems that deleteing a mapping just disconnects it (not delete) and mapping fails when you already have it mapped. Lots to look at. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developers Jos Posted November 4, 2004 Developers Share Posted November 4, 2004 The drivemap functions have been on the bug fix list for a while. It seems that deleteing a mapping just disconnects it (not delete) and mapping fails when you already have it mapped. Lots to look at.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Did you see the fix posted in the original support thread ? #39340 SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page - Beta files Read before posting How to post scriptsource Forum etiquette Forum Rules Live for the present, Dream of the future, Learn from the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted November 4, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted November 4, 2004 Did you see the fix posted in the original support thread ? #39340I didn't, thanks Does that also fix the problem of drive mapping an already mapped drive failing? Maybe I should just force a drivemapdel before a drivemapadd is performed. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now