Jump to content

RegExp expert needed


Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm trying to validate an input box entry a bit like what you find on forum registration forms when your e-mail isn't typed correctly (syntax checker ? sorry...can't find the correct naming in english)

Here's the type of string I want to validate : F2; F3; F10; F9; F3; F8

In other words, a list of function keys from F1 to F12 separated with "; "

So far I'm stuck with this problem, the following string is validated because the pattern is found but I want to reject it because of the h

$stringtest = "F4; F5; h"
$pattern = "(F[123456789]; ){0,10}"

ConsoleWrite(StringRegExp($stringtest , $pattern)&@CRLF)

{0,10} is there to allow an empty string and maximum 10 keys

When I'll solve this, I'll have the problem of finding how to add the F10 F11 and F12 since my pattern only check F1 to F9 :)

I'm used to regexp but they're totally different in the other soft I'm using.. not Unix/Perl style, and writing regexps is a bit old for me..

*back to massive brain usage*

Edited by MikeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I'm trying to validate an input box entry a bit like what you find on forum registration forms when your e-mail isn't typed correctly (syntax checker ? sorry...can't find the correct naming in english)

Here's the type of string I want to validate : F2; F3; F10; F9; F3; F8

In other words, a list of function keys from F1 to F12 separated with "; "

So far I'm stuck with this problem, the following string is validated because the pattern is found but I want to reject it because of the h

$stringtest = "F4; F5; h"
$pattern = "(F[123456789]; ){0,10}"

ConsoleWrite(StringRegExp($stringtest , $pattern)&@CRLF)

{0,10} is there to allow an empty string and maximum 10 keys

When I'll solve this, I'll have the problem of finding how to add the F10 F11 and F12 since my pattern only check F1 to F9 :)

I'm used to regexp but they're totally different in the other soft I'm using.. not Unix/Perl style, and writing regexps is a bit old for me..

*back to massive brain usage*

I'm not so good on STRingRegExp. I would do it like this.

$stringtest = "F4; F5; h"
$pattern = StringSplit($stringtest,';')
For $n = 1 To $pattern[0]
$valid = True   
If StringRegExp($pattern[$n],"\h*F\d{1,2}\h*") = 0 then
    MsgBox(0,"ERROR",$pattern[$n])
EndIf
Next

EDIT:removed unnecessary quote characters (\Q \E)

Edited by martin
Serial port communications UDF Includes functions for binary transmission and reception.printing UDF Useful for graphs, forms, labels, reports etc.Add User Call Tips to SciTE for functions in UDFs not included with AutoIt and for your own scripts.Functions with parameters in OnEvent mode and for Hot Keys One function replaces GuiSetOnEvent, GuiCtrlSetOnEvent and HotKeySet.UDF IsConnected2 for notification of status of connected state of many urls or IPs, without slowing the script.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My example was basic..

I'm trying to make a validation script that will reject this :

F3;hF2; F9;k+]; fdjklm F3

with StringSplit you're assuming the string is correctly formed with "; " delimiters... (not ";" btw)

further thinkings : if I can detect the biggest matching pattern in my string, that is, in :

'F4; F6; F9; F10; F10' get : 'F4; F6; F9; F10; F10' as result and not small patterns like 'F4; ' or 'F9; F10; F10;'

then I can compare this result with the string.. if it's the same, my string is valid, if it's not that means the string has unnecessary characters like this :

'gfjdfdklj F4; F6; F9; F10; F10 djkj<>'

...the pattern exists but the string is not valid.

Edited by MikeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My example was basic..

I'm trying to make a validation script that will reject this :

F3;hF2; F9;k+]; fdjklm F3

with StringSplit you're assuming the string is correctly formed with "; " delimiters... (not ";" btw)

further thinkings : if I can detect the biggest matching pattern in my string, that is, in :

'F4; F6; F9; F10; F10' get : 'F4; F6; F9; F10; F10' as result and not small patterns like 'F4; ' or 'F9; F10; F10;'

then I can compare this result with the string.. if it's the same, my string is valid, if it's not that means the string has unnecessary characters like this :

'gfjdfdklj F4; F6; F9; F10; F10 djkj<>'

...the pattern exists but the string is not valid.

Not sure I understand. Does this do what you want, even though it doesn't use StringRegExp?

$stringtest = "F3;hF2; F9;k+]; fdjklm F3; F555"
$pattern = StringSplit($stringtest, ';')

For $n = 1 To $pattern[0]
    $valid = True
    $stemp = StringStripWS($pattern[$n], 3)
    If StringLen($stemp) > 3 Then
        $valid = False
    ElseIf StringMid($stemp, 1, 1) <> 'F' Then
        $valid = False
    Else
        $num = Number(StringMid($stemp, 2, StringLen($stemp) - 1))
        If 'F' & $num <> $stemp Then $valid = False
    EndIf
    If Not $valid Then MsgBox(0, "Error", $stemp)
Next
Serial port communications UDF Includes functions for binary transmission and reception.printing UDF Useful for graphs, forms, labels, reports etc.Add User Call Tips to SciTE for functions in UDFs not included with AutoIt and for your own scripts.Functions with parameters in OnEvent mode and for Hot Keys One function replaces GuiSetOnEvent, GuiCtrlSetOnEvent and HotKeySet.UDF IsConnected2 for notification of status of connected state of many urls or IPs, without slowing the script.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't.. put a valid string in your test string and errors will popup

what I need is to find the regexp way to say (in english language.. not using any regexp syntax here) :

Find the largest substring in a string matching that statement :

" F character immediately followed by one element in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) followed by ;[sPACE] " repeated 0 up to 10 times

said another way, given $string = "blahblah F10; F3; F5; F5; F2; F9; F10; blahbahblah"

return : expression found ! and $expression = "F10; F3; F5; F5; F2; F9; F10; "

typically a situation to use regexps but until now I'm still searching how to write it :)

Edited by MikeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Hubertus I was really stubborn about using Regexp (and I guess I will find how to write it in the long run) but your code is actually what I needed. I guess I'll use it and quit searching that regexp for a while.. got many other things to do and since I couldn't find a way to find a failure to your script .. all good ^^

ty again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks both!

Damn.. this :

$ptnExp = '((?-i)(F\d?\d; )+)'
is what I've been searching for roughly 3 hours... :) It does exactly what I wanted. Now let's take another hour to understand it.

Posted Image

I realise I was having troubles too with StringRegexp since you're using Option 3 and I was struggling with 1 and 2...

edit : nope.. still something missing since it will match this : "F24; F12; F3; F3; F99; "

and I need to the first number to be only 1 .. or nothing (function keys.. F1 to F12 ) and if that character is set to 1.. then the 2nd character must belong to (0,1,2) to take only 10 11 and 12

then.. this : $ptnExp = '((?-i)(F1?\d; )+)' will not match "F24; F12; F3; F99"

the problem is it matches : "F13; F15; F18"

I guess I will need conditional subpatterns or maybe assertions and I hope Autoit supports them...

or I'll just keep going on with Hubertus's solution :( but we're so close to that regexp...

Edited by MikeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nevermind !!! I, MikeP, apologizes to all Regexp purists... but I wrote it ... like this (lol) :

$ptnExp = '((?-i)(F(1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12); )+)'

...sorry ..I'm out ! (and yes it works even if it's awful ahhaha)

thx Greenhorn :)

Edited by MikeP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...