UPSman2 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 (edited) Well as the topic says its unfinished and it seems i never finish any project... its for reference for anyone who's going to trying to try make a fully functional/faster one what is it? -basically its a memory searcher -the only problem is that search speed isn't great with method used with V1, and the method in V2 crashes at Stringsplit how? -V1: basically does a virtquery of selected process and reads the section into a single Byte[xxx] return, then uses stringinstr() to search within it. -V2: same as V1 but instead of stringinstr() it uses stringsplit() method...which causes an error i personally would like to further the development of this project but unfortunately search speed is slow on V1 so there is no point unless i can get a faster method like V2... well this code is messy... feel free to ask questions if you have any V1 and V2 attached belowV1.au3V2.au3 Edited June 21, 2008 by UPSman2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 Attach code as files. Blog - Seriously epic web hosting - Twitter - GitHub - Cachet HQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRowe Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 Also, codeboxes are great. Great idea, btw, but you're probably going to have to look outside AutoIt to speed things up to a useable level. However, I've always wanted an easily scriptable memory search tool, as that would cut down on locating pointers and so on, and also automating offset discovery. This is nice [center]However, like ninjas, cyber warriors operate in silence.AutoIt Chat Engine (+Chatbot) , Link Grammar for AutoIt , Simple Speech RecognitionArtificial Neural Networks UDF , Bayesian Networks UDF , Pattern Matching UDFTransparent PNG GUI Elements , Au3Irrlicht 2Advanced Mouse Events MonitorGrammar Database GeneratorTransitions & Tweening UDFPoker Hand Evaluator[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UPSman2 Posted June 21, 2008 Author Share Posted June 21, 2008 well... personally i think it might be possible to make this relatively fast if you focus down to dll calls and math, so my personal goal would be to make it in autoit anyways ;p Edit: Added files to orginal post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now