Administrators Jon Posted January 23, 2005 Administrators Share Posted January 23, 2005 Updated:http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/files/beta/autoitx/Brought up-to-date with the current beta of the main AutoIt version. It is actually looking possible that I could include this when we release 3.0.103 so quick testing would be very helpful (and doc checking/typos/bad links etc.)- Docs updated to use same style/template as main AutoItAdded:- Added: WinGetProcess()- Added: "main", "primary", "menu", "secondary" added as valid mouse button types.- Added: ControlListView()- Added: ControlGetHandle()- Added: WinSetTrans()Changed/Fixed:- Changed: IniDelete() can also delete entire sections- Changed: The mouse and pixel functions now have an additional "client area" mode.- Changed: PixelChecksum() now has optional step parameter- Changed: Control...() functions now accept the Control ID as an extra way to identify a control- Fixed: StatusBarGetText() failed when used with no "Text" parameter Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvenP Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Updated:http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/files/beta/autoitx/Brought up-to-date with the current beta of the main AutoIt version. It is actually looking possible that I could include this when we release 3.0.103 so quick testing would be very helpfile (and doc checking/typos/bad links etc.)- Docs updated to use same style/template as main AutoIt....<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Jon,According to the AutoItX docs it's under GNU LGP License. And that states:... 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Library'scomplete source code as you receive it, ...This was a hot issue with AutoIt....changed your mind about AutoItX ?Regards,-Sven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyberSlug Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 ... quick testing would be very helpfile (and doc checking/typos/bad links etc.) ...<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Don't you mean "helpful" instead of "helpfile" Some things upon quick inspection:- ALL references to "AutoIt Window Spy" need replaced by "AutoIt Window Info Tool"- Is the license up to date?- You might want to sync the re-org of the "Misc Functions": Graphics and Sound Functions (Color Mode Opt and all the Pixel___ functions) Sleep funtion was moved to another section in AU3 docs, too- UrlDownloadToFile? is that name outdated- AutoItSetOption: Nix the parens in Remarks "You may use Opt() as an alternative to AutoItSetOption()." Use Mozilla | Take a look at My Disorganized AutoIt stuff | Very very old: AutoBuilder 11 Jan 2005 prototype I need to update my sig! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvenP Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 The example in ClipGet() is incorrect: Set oAutoIt = WScript.CreateObject("AutoItX3.Control") text = ClipGet() WScript.Echo "Clipboard contains:" & text Should be: Set oAutoIt = WScript.CreateObject("AutoItX3.Control") text = oAutoIt.ClipGet() WScript.Echo "Clipboard contains:" & text Regards, -Sven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 23, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 23, 2005 Oh yeah license, thanks. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 23, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 23, 2005 Don't you mean "helpful" instead of "helpfile" Writing docs. It's not big and clever kids, just say no. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvenP Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Jon, The history/changelog at the end of the helpfile does not look like that of AutoItX. Looks more like the regular AutoIt one. Regards, -Sven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 23, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 23, 2005 K, I've sorted those. I'm unsure whether I'm going to leave URLDownload/InetGet in there. It sort of seems out of place. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 23, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 23, 2005 Oops, I'd uploaded an old AutoIt3X.dll - how stupid... :"> Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bshoenhair Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 @Jon Any chance adding ProcessList and StringStripWS ? These would be nice additions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 24, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 24, 2005 @JonAny chance adding ProcessList and StringStripWS ? These would be nice additions.StringStripWS? Nah, if a host language doesn't have any string handling its users should switch to full AutoIt ProcessList, yeah, I wanted to do that but the problem of returning arrays rears its ugly head again. Could do some sort of delimited string return but not very elegant. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigred Posted January 27, 2005 Share Posted January 27, 2005 Ahh this is good news! About the ProcessList, a delimited string would be a little messy, but at least the functionality would be there. I mean at least people would have the option to use it if they needed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gumtoo Posted January 30, 2005 Share Posted January 30, 2005 just to say it's great to see a new version of autoItX whatever the new features are. Thanks Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted January 30, 2005 Author Administrators Share Posted January 30, 2005 Updated: Added the "regexp=" window matching mode. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigred Posted February 3, 2005 Share Posted February 3, 2005 What does regexp do? I searched the forum, and the v3.0.102 docs but didn't find anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredledingue Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 ok, I'v found it. You should make this thread sticky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Drache Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 (edited) StringStripWS? Nah, if a host language doesn't have any string handling its users should switch to full AutoIt Agreed, however, the VB-6 (Legacy) string handling functions leave something to be desired.There are times when I long for the robustness that SSWS() is.Trim(MyString) != StringStripWS(MyString,4)Example:Dim MyString As String MyString = " some text " Trim(MyString) returns "some text" StringStripWS(MyString,4) returns "some text"That's the only real example I can think of off of the top of my head. Edited August 17, 2005 by Blue_Drache Lofting the cyberwinds on teknoleather wings, I am...The Blue Drache Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now