Timeline
Oct 18, 2018:
- 9:08 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) updated by
- Replying to mLipok: > Could Au3Check.exe at least display a warning in SciTE console, if there is no appropriate termination in a given UDF ? It likely is possible, like coping without the crlf, but I don't know of a simple way of doing that. The whole issue is that Flex&Yacc are used which generate a lot of the actual code and the reading process is part of that standard code which I can't change. I do not have enough knowledge to fix this without risk and honestly this is too trivial to have any risk. You know pretty quickly when it it telling you the wrong line/file to be able to fix this. Jos
- 5:47 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) updated by
- Could Au3Check.exe at least display a warning in SciTE console, if there is no appropriate termination in a given UDF ?
Oct 17, 2018:
- 1:10 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) closed by
- Wont Fix
- 1:09 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) updated by
- I have had a look but there is no easy solution to this issue in the way au3check is coded, so all I can say is make sure you have a (cr)lf as last character in each included file, or no errors on the last line. Jos
Oct 16, 2018:
- 2:39 PM Ticket #3667 (Continuation line with no code on it passes Au3Check but at runtime ...) updated by
- @c.haslam, please stop adding stuff to the report. The basic question is clear and that is the only thing that needs to be answered in this report. Don't know who added the AutoitUpdate image and issue, but that has been removed from this topic as there is no relation what so ever. Simply create a new issue in case you find one. Jos
- 12:44 PM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") closed by
- Fixed: Fixed by revision [12180] in version: 3.3.15.1
- 12:41 PM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") updated by
- Replying to mLipok: > EDIT: > I mean that there should not be mentioned "Struct" and all mentioned mnemonic are keywords. Ah, that does indeed make sense. Jos
- 2:18 AM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") updated by
- My point was not about which part of code fires this error. You can fire the same error with this following single line: […] The issue which I report here is about "used wording": Error: No variable given for "Dim", "Local", "Global", "Struct" or "Const" statement. Error: No variable given for "Dim", "Local", "Global", "Static" or "Const" keyword. EDIT: I mean that there should not be mentioned "Struct" and all mentioned mnemonic are keywords.
Oct 15, 2018:
- 9:00 AM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") updated by
- Don't think so, static is a total separate keyword and doesn't belong in that line at all. In this case the error is triggered on Const. Jos
Oct 14, 2018:
- 11:17 PM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") updated by
-
Version, Description changed
- 11:16 PM Ticket #3669 (Error message "Struct") created by
- Try to run this code: […] DO NOT USE Au3Check just AutoIt. You …
Oct 1, 2018:
- 8:24 PM Ticket #3555 (_GUICtrlRichEdit_StreamToVar with > 2048 characters) updated by
- Can confirm this is fixed in AutoIt 3.3.15.1
Sep 25, 2018:
- 7:21 PM Ticket #3657 (Incorrect behaviour while using _GUICtrlListView_SimpleSort when no ...) closed by
- Fixed: Fixed by revision [12167] in version: 3.3.15.1
- 7:10 PM Ticket #3660 (Enhancement - PixelSearch to return the color it found) updated by
- / A gaming bot for one / Not exactly the best argument to put forward to support your request - read the Forum rules to see why: https://www.autoitscript.com/forum/topic/169097-forum-rules/ / an incremental improvement in design / Much better. ;) I am not convinced that there is a need for this other than for gaming - "sensible" apps tend not to have elements with colour changes happening so quickly, nor do they normally require the use of colour ranges. But if it is easy to do.....we will let the Devs decide. M23
- 7:02 PM Ticket #3668 (.exe has stopped working error message) closed by
- No Bug: You have a forum thread running on this problem - please do not create a ticket unless you have a confirmed bug. M23
- 2:39 PM Ticket #3660 (Enhancement - PixelSearch to return the color it found) updated by
- Actually, this makes sense if you think about it in this way... What the PixelSearch function does is allow you to specify ranges, and it goes off and finds a specific value that matches those ranges. It allows you to specify a range of X. It allows you to specify a range of Y. It allows you to specify a range of C. (Color) It goes off and looks for a match and returns what it found. It returns the matching X it found within the range of X you specified. It returns the matching Y it found within the range of Y you specified. But it does not return the matching C it found within the range of C you specified. It would be an improvement to return all three of the matching parameters instead of just two of them. Expecting the caller to make a second call to PixelGetColor is not only a needless waste of cycles, but it also expects the caller to depend on a race condition. They would get the correct value back from a followup call to PixelGetColor only if the screen didn't happen to update in between those two function calls. It's easy to argue that calling PixelGetColor gets you the info you need, but that would be arguing in favor of a race condition. It seems it would just make sense to return all 3 matching params rather than just two out of three. It would not only eliminate the race condition issue, but it should also be minimal programming effort to return the extra value since it obviously is already being looked at internally, and it also would be a backwards compatible code change. It seems there is more benefit to do it than not to.
- 1:19 PM Ticket #3668 (.exe has stopped working error message) created by
- Hi I have little experience in Auto IT tool. we have created code …
- 9:07 AM Ticket #3667 (Continuation line with no code on it passes Au3Check but at runtime ...) updated by
-
Owner, Status changed
- 9:03 AM Ticket #3667 (Continuation line with no code on it passes Au3Check but at runtime ...) updated by
- Even simpler example. This is ok: […] This is not: […] Giving this error: […] So the question is whether just a continuation character on a line is valid syntax? Jos
- 12:27 AM Ticket #3667 (Continuation line with no code on it passes Au3Check but at runtime ...) created by
- Try this script: […]
Sep 24, 2018:
- 2:46 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) updated by
- This is confirmed and happens when the last line in an included file has an error and doesn't have a CRLF at the end. Needs investigation why this is happening.
- 12:22 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) updated by
-
Description changed
- 12:19 PM Ticket #3666 (Au3Check issue when error is in include at last line and there is no ...) created by
- Try to run: Track_Au3Check_Main.au3 […] After quick check you …
Sep 21, 2018:
- 1:00 PM Ticket #3664 (Spam) closed by
- Rejected
- 1:00 PM Ticket #3664 (Spam) updated by
-
Description, Summary changed
- 7:00 AM Ticket #3664 (Spam) updated by
-
Version changed
Automatic ticket cleanup. - 6:10 AM Ticket #3664 (Spam) created by
- Text removed - M23
Note:
See TracTimeline
for information about the timeline view.
