Talk:Function list: Difference between revisions

From AutoIt Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:


::::Where specifically? [[User:Jaberwocky6669|Jaberwocky6669]] ([[User talk:Jaberwocky6669|talk]]) 03:48, 12 November 2012 (GMT)
::::Where specifically? [[User:Jaberwocky6669|Jaberwocky6669]] ([[User talk:Jaberwocky6669|talk]]) 03:48, 12 November 2012 (GMT)
Here at [[AutoIt_Wiki_talk:Community_portal]] .--[[User_talk:IEvKI3gv9Wrkd41u|<i><font color="#666" size="2px">.MvGulik.</font></i>]] 12:01, 12 November 2012 (GMT)

Revision as of 12:01, 12 November 2012

(Old question)

This page appears to be a direct copy of the doc page. I'd like to organize these items by categories like "math", "IO", and "UI" in order to improve searching for a specific function. Is there any opposition to this? Mythobeast 05:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Link convertion

Converted all wiki links to template:Help File -- if this is unacceptable then just revert. (--Jaberwocky6669)

I don't really have a problem with this. But this also or makes orphans of the function_link pages. So I think the general question becomes whether or not to keep those function_link pages. (Think you just targeted half of the AutoIt wiki to the trashbin. *grin*) --.MvGulik. 17:42, 11 November 2012 (GMT)
Meh, They've been around for years and who is going to manually maintain these pages. If Jon would allow a bot to do it then it wouldn't be a bad deal. Jaberwocky6669 (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2012 (GMT)
Maybe this could stand as it is until those UDF pages are created and formatted well. Jaberwocky6669 (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2012 (GMT)
I don't mind if there ditched. As I don't see then as useful at this moment either. Just in case, I'll put up a objection section for it.
UDF pages: Not sure what you have in mind here. --.MvGulik. 00:38, 12 November 2012 (GMT)
Where specifically? Jaberwocky6669 (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2012 (GMT)


Here at AutoIt_Wiki_talk:Community_portal .--.MvGulik. 12:01, 12 November 2012 (GMT)