Opened 9 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#3017 closed Bug (Duplicate)
The largest negative integer value we misinterpret
| Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | Component: | AutoIt | |
| Version: | 3.3.13.20 | Severity: | None |
| Keywords: | integer | Cc: |
Description
The following code illustrates the problem
ConsoleWrite("- 9223372036854775808 = (int)" & Int (-9223372036854775808) & "= (hex)" & Hex (-9223372036854775808) &CRLF)
ConsoleWrite("- 9223372036854775807-1 = (int)" & Int (-9223372036854775807 - 1) & "= (hex)" & Hex (-9223372036854775807 - 1) &CRLF)
at -9223372036854775808 I get as a result -9223372036854775807
at (-9223372036854775807 - 1) I get the correct result -9223372036854775808
tested with the last stable and beta version
Attachments (0)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by jchd18
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by BrewManNH
That's not an Int64 value, it's too large. When converting it to a 64 bit value, -9223372036854775808 and -9223372036854775807 yield the same result.
http://www.binaryconvert.com/result_double.html?decimal=045057050050051051055050048051054056053052055055053056048056
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by anonymous
Not Int with Double confused !!
http://calc.penjee.com/?s=HJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by jchd18
-9223372036854775808 and -9223372036854775807 yield the same result.
Only when using a site which limits integral values to Int32 or under the double tab.
And no they are not the same value and both are valid int64 values.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by czardas
This appears to be a bug connected with string conversion. See the following topic : https://www.autoitscript.com/forum/topic/176690-number-puzzle/ It seems to occur with various functions which convert the integer to a string - including ConsoleWrite.
ConsoleWrite(-9223372036854775808 & @LF) ; -9223372036854775807
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by jchd18
- Summary changed from The smallest value of integer we misinterpreted to The largest negative integer value we misinterpret
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by Jpm
- Resolution set to Duplicate
- Status changed from new to closed
same as #3772
Guidelines for posting comments:
- You cannot re-open a ticket but you may still leave a comment if you have additional information to add.
- In-depth discussions should take place on the forum.
For more information see the full version of the ticket guidelines here.
This is rather the largest negative int64 value, but yes there seems to be an issue with parsing the literal value -9223372036854775808.