Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#996 closed Bug (Fixed)
Beta documentation errors (Tweaky)
| Reported by: | Tweaky | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | 3.3.1.2 | Component: | Documentation |
| Version: | 3.3.1.1 | Severity: | None |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hi,
we have translate the english helpfile into german.
So we see that some errors are in der the english helpfile.
I should find out where the optional tag is missing
(see http://www.autoitscript.com/trac/autoit/ticket/985#comment:3)
If the syntax [occurs, it must be in the description the word optionally be included.
This is the case with the features in the txt file is not the case.
I hope this is correct. If not, can I correct my script again
Attachments (3)
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
I have updated the built-in functions with the changes. I'm not going to update the UDFs yet until we internally finalize on how we are actually going to document UDFs. Right now there is some redundancy in the way UDFs are documented and I'm a little bit afraid I'm going to spend the next 2 hours fixing this only to have somebody run a script and obliterate all my work. For that reason I'm going to leave this ticket open. If we happen to release 3.3.1.1 before this ticket is closed, feel free to attach the full output from your script run against 3.3.1.1 documentation.
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | 8 errors 3.3.1.1 beta optional.txt added |
|---|
errors 3.3.1.1 beta optional is missing
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
So, Valik want that I attach the errors of 3.3.1.1 here.
So I will do this now.
I have attached two txt-files
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
| Summary: | errors in der helpfile for AutoIt 3.3.1.0 Beta optional tag is missing → Beta documentation errors (Tweaky) |
|---|---|
| Version: | 3.3.1.0 → 3.3.1.1 |
I've changed the name of the ticket and removed the previous attachment that is now out-dated.
Any chance of getting a copy of this script? Do you have it posted somewhere that you keep updated? I could look into integrating it into our build process if you provide us a copy of it.
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
No I have posted it not.
I think I could give you the script - but not yet.
I watch my script und must write it a bit easier, if possible.
Currently there are about 550 lines.
However, there may be a while until I come.
If I had finished it, I would post it somewhere and then I write you a PM.
The comments are also English, I will not translate them.
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
I have attach a third txt-file with the errors at the related functions.
I have corrected the script so:
- it is no error when built-in functions not refer to UDFs
- it is no error when UDFs not refer to built-in functions
I think you must not correct all.
Please look which is necessary
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
| Milestone: | → 3.3.1.2 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → Fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
7/8/9 should be fixed

Holy shit, I should be careful what I ask for. Thanks.