Jump to content

Spanky

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Spanky's Achievements

Seeker

Seeker (1/7)

0

Reputation

  1. poc.au3-> Hacker. Nice try, but Wrong :)oÝ÷ Ø1ÞëajÝý±û§!h®Ø^7ǫ̈ºÈhºWijË^jÇ+m«wöÇè®f­x2j«uج)áz·¾)@Ü(Âz=z£Z­ì¨¸TÛH-mªíÿN½êåk µêÚ±ç(ÛkÈ(¶+ZºÚ"µÍÙÐÞ ÌÎNÔØÜ ÌÎNË ÌÎNÒH[HHX[ØÜ ÌÎNÊ What a nice stub. <Removed> What a nice piece of code/patch
  2. Why only talking about it and think how hard this could/might/should be insteat of just doing it.Of course this will work and fucking up UPX is easy that you might thought. In an packed UPX-exe overwrite everything (obviously this will not more than 0x80byte) what comes before offset 0x0400 with 00. exe will run as normal but UPX -d sorely will miss this data. Why use UPX - there are more exe-packer out there. Especially one whose put all their efforts on making it hard to unpack/remove them since their 'protection' relys on their presents. So what about using Armadillon, ASPack & ASProtect, PE-Compact, Morhine... Or binder like nBind or Molehole. Get Ollydbg (or some other debugger) if poking around with a hexeditor don't make sence anymore.With some patience & experience you may also get out or modify small parts of source that 'interests' you.
  3. Why I can't ride of the feeling most ppl considering RE as some kinda 'Black Art' or 'computer heretic stuff' when I reading this. Yeh I felt that there's more potential.Indeep this methode is really usefull to keep the noobs off or amaze them. But in my eyes some other really nasty stuff is obfucation(as for ex. EncodeIt does). To me this can be more bitching than a 'nonstandard' AutoIT file. Anyway there is nothing against putting those two together.
×
×
  • Create New...