Zibit

Good point 2D games in autoit have evolved pretty far, though most of them aren't using any graphics engine. I can remember a game written in purely autoit no graphics libraries or anything, it was a bike game, a simple game but the physics amazed me. That game was proof that autoit can handle game physics.

Exactly, you are using dynamic libraries, which basically is being used by every game engine. A part of building games is using an graphics library, and that graphics library is irrlicht. We are talking about building a game not building an graphics library. Do you think Call of duty is just made in 1 language ? No, in fact it's made of several. The game engine (IW Engine) is written in C/C++ but there are included dynamic libraries of different sorts of language's.

Actually i disagree with twitchyliquid64, things have turned for the better in autoit after JRowe's magnificent release of au3Irrlicht and bogQ's au3Impact which have given autoit a HUGE boost in gaming. Sure i agree that the 3D game's made so far are second-rate at best, but nonetheless autoit has been moving towards a brighter future in gaming and still is. A lot of people say that autoit can never have a future in gaming because of it's massive CPU consumption but that isn't necessarily true, because if people like JRowe keep on doing the good work, they will find ways to get passed autoit's faults and reach the bright future they've been heading towards.

Hi, I have an problem and i haven't found a solution for it. Does anyone know how to give IE browser extra POST values that it shouldn't have. For ex, you go directly to e.g http://google.com/index.php and you wanna give it lets say $_POST['test'] = 1; value, how can i do that ? there is no element in google.com/index.php with the name test but i wanna give it one. I know it can be done by directly connection with TCP but thats just going the wrong way, my program is based on IE.au3 already theres not much point on converting it to TCP. Thx ahead, Zibit.

Wow, This is spectacular. I've always seen in AutoIt's AI department great potential, but this exceeds all expectations. Been working on AI's for a while now and i can say just by looking a this, that it will speed up my work exponentially. I give my thanks. Zibit

I think an IPC should be in the kernel. i like to develop Operating System's and in my OS i ALWAYS add 200 bytes to memory for each process for inter-process relations. Each line inserted to that memory has a specific Address for another process, The address in fact is the other process NC&PID (Number of Communications, so they wont have conflicts with other communications) and the other reads the commands and the command gets deleted for memory freeing. Its quite simple and effective, so my point is. You cant make an effective IPC without kernel support because kernel can call functions when a communication line has been inserted. the only other way you can make an effective ICP is TCP server which isn't effective at ALL.

First, i doubt it will take a couple of hundred lines just to send a key. *unless you are planning to add all the failsafe's and debug's. There should be an include file called SendKeys.h What could be useful. And isn't this the wrong place for these questions ? I mean this is a developer chatting not C Support.

Yes, the problem isnt inside the function, the problem is in the parameter's. Sometimes you have to think outside the function You need to change the _SearchString parameter. at the moment it isnt a string but an index for the array. take a look. Func _SearchString($hListView, $sSearchString) ConsoleWrite($hListView & @CRLF) If StringReplace($hListView, " ", "") = "" Or StringReplace($sSearchString, " ", "") = "" Then Return SetError(2, 0, 0) $iStringInStr = StringInStr($hListView, $sSearchString) If Not $iStringInStr Then Return SetError(1, 0, 0) Local $aReturn[2] = [$iStringInStr, $iStringInStr + StringLen($sSearchString)] Return $aReturn EndFunc Rookie mistake, it will only make things worse Hope i helped.

i've never heard that somebody have made this but yeah hotkeyset is a good choice indeed.

you are trying to make a game bot or some sort? i know various games that use Ahn's lab hackshield it blocks out all MouseClick simulations (even Send function). if you are not trying to bot prove me otherwise. Edit: why this Sleep(2000); While 1 < 2 MouseMove(1014, 811, 0); //Click Start MouseClick("Left"); Sleep(2000); WEnd when you can do it like this While 1 Sleep(2000) MouseClick("Left", 1014, 811, 1, 0) WEnd

i like it ^^ it reminds me of rocketdock

it is look at the title it says help. this isnt a general help support section.

hehe i like this

yes botting shouldn't be against the rules in my opinion (hacking should) ---- btw you're in the wrong section too ^^

k theres no way im going to read that but im guessing you just want to know how to start the project. you should check au3irrilicht or au3impact. they are 3D dimension. they are a HUGE help to 3D projects. like my Planetary gravity engine using au3Irrilicht it was a huge help to the project.