Oh no. I love these AI things. I run one at home. I Always start with a smiley to set the tone ( is a thinking model ) and treated as if a human. In translations is very considerate of the tone and how the translation is perceived. And as stupid as it may be, I always thank it when it finished a task. Even if it wont remember.
Alright then. Your idea was shit. And I don't want to sound hostile but .... I follow your doings with admiration since a long time now. This one post is astonishingly nonsensical. Looks beautiful. I wish the claims were real just to admire its beauty, but is horseshit. Worst of all, new users may find it awesome.. and does leaves one in awe, but is gravely misleading and that is my big problem with the post.
Is so easy for a human LLM ( you or me or anyone ) to be mesmerized by the AI output that one is just enamored with it and without much judgment justify it, take it in and believe !, this irrational LLM. These AI can make an excellent politician
Yes, my big problem with this post is how beautifully misleading it is. I'd say that it, is diabolical ( in a very innocent way ).
These AI are innocent and that is a problem. Associating words is a lot of what we humans do, but this neuro-LLM-thigs are justifying what they came to conclude and sounds convincing but ... they are innocent yet, deceptive.
As any court judge, I too blame the "orchestrator". You read proof the text before posting, and posted anyway. The post is detrimental.
I would say, "thank you all, I stand corrected" and delete the post ( via a moderator, move it to test ? ).
@Trong, I sill hold you in high regard ( I'd say I love you instead, but I fear @Somerset's take on my speech )
All this is no big deal. Wrong, very wrong, but "no big deal"