Administrators Jon Posted March 17, 2004 Administrators Share Posted March 17, 2004 (edited) Here is the list of functions planned for AutoItX3. The ones with a "-" next to them have been completed. Although I have _already_ done the underlying code for all the Win.... functions so when I get to those it will take about 5 minutes to do them all. I'm doing the functions alphabetically as it makes a couple of ActiveX related things easier. I'll up date this list every few hours when I am working on it - AutoItSetOption/Opt - BlockInput - CDTray - ClipGet - ClipPut - ControlClick - ControlCommand - ControlDisable - ControlEnable - ControlFocus - ControlGetFocus - ControlGetPosX - ControlGetPosY - ControlGetPosHeight - ControlGetPosWidth - ControlGetText - ControlHide - ControlMove - ControlSend - ControlSetText - ControlShow File functions removed - host language to support - IniDelete - IniRead - IniWrite - IsAdmin - MouseClick - MouseClickDrag - MouseDown - MouseGetCursor - MouseGetPosX - MouseGetPosY - MouseMove - MouseUp - Opt - PixelGetColor - PixelSearch - ProcessClose - ProcessExists - ProcessWait - ProcessWaitClose Registry functions removed - host language to support - Run - RunAsSet - RunWait - Send - Shutdown - Sleep - StatusbarGetText - ToolTip - URLDownloadToFile WinActivate WinActive WinClose WinExists WinGetCaretPosX WinGetCaretPosY WinGetClassList WinGetClientSizeHeight WinGetClientSizeWidth WinGetHandle WinGetPosX WinGetPosY WinGetPosWidth WinGetPosHeight WinGetState WinGetText WinGetTitle WinKill WinMenuSelectItem WinMinimizeAll WinMinimizeAllUndo WinMove WinSetOnTop WinSetState WinSetTitle WinWait WinWaitActive WinWaitClose WinWaitNotActive Edited March 18, 2004 by Jon Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted March 17, 2004 Share Posted March 17, 2004 I never write with those .dll but is it really needed to port StringFormat which is a wrapper of sprintf? No additional functions inside AutoIt3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted March 17, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted March 17, 2004 I never write with those .dll but is it really needed to port StringFormat which is a wrapper of sprintf? No additional functions inside AutoIt3Not for using the DLL in C or something. But I thought it might be pretty useful for VB. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted March 17, 2004 Share Posted March 17, 2004 Not for using the DLL in C or something. But I thought it might be pretty useful for VB.I understand now the relationship. So keep it.If the source for dll is available I can try to do it.Remember my job on GUI is almost over (101.6) soon you need to take over.Definetly after .dll .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nutster Posted March 17, 2004 Share Posted March 17, 2004 VB and MFC both provide a facility for InputBox and MsgBox. As much I would like to see my work in the AutoItX3, it would just be taking up space. David NuttallNuttall Computer Consulting An Aquarius born during the Age of Aquarius AutoIt allows me to re-invent the wheel so much faster. I'm off to write a wizard, a wonderful wizard of odd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted March 18, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted March 18, 2004 I never write with those .dll but is it really needed to port StringFormat which is a wrapper of sprintf? No additional functions inside AutoIt3Too difficult anyhow, I forgot about the whole variant and a variable number of variables aspect which doesn't work well in the wrapper. Never mind. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpm Posted March 18, 2004 Share Posted March 18, 2004 Too difficult anyhow, I forgot about the whole variant and a variable number of variables aspect which doesn't work well in the wrapper. Never mind.Keep going S is near W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted March 18, 2004 Author Administrators Share Posted March 18, 2004 Up to W now. I'll save that for tomorrow. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now