Administrators Jon Posted July 25, 2014 Author Administrators Posted July 25, 2014 That means we have to review code where a zero-size variable e.g. Binary('') may be passed or result in a buffer of size zero then adjust things with new error codes. Just WinAPI[Ex] is a lot! Can you give some examples? I don't know any winapi that when expecting a string wouldn't expecting a string pointer that just points to a memory location than in turn contains a single 0 char. The struct you are asking about can't exist This won't even compile: struct { char new[0]; } test; So no winapi would ever be able to handle it. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Administrators Jon Posted July 25, 2014 Author Administrators Posted July 25, 2014 Hello! After version 3.3.13.7 arrays work noticably slower -- from ~11% slower for 1D arrays to ~24% for 3D array... And btw, curiously enough, version 3.3.13.6 is slightly faster that 3.3.12.0 Fixed next beta. JScript 1 Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now