weaponx Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 Right. But like I said, we have to do everything in arrays and have many people. I'm going to leave this topic muttleyMe too. This needs to be discussed in a dedicated topic.
PsaltyDS Posted July 17, 2008 Posted July 17, 2008 That would be nice but not the major point we were discussing, native array functions. These are a realistic request whereas asking for OOP would ellicit an angry response.One response to the native array functionality, and other requests, has been that the interpreter engine needs to be a single, small, tight binary. The Devs don't want the .exe to get fat. Its more than I know to calculate how many KB might have to be added to the .exe for each of those functions, but I do know that is a major concern. "Compiling" to a small .exe size is a big AutoIt advantage over other languages. muttley Valuater's AutoIt 1-2-3, Class... Is now in Session!For those who want somebody to write the script for them: RentACoder"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." -- Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now