Jos

Highly doubt he's able/capable, and guess you mean somebody else! 😉

Just keep it like that and you'll be fine. 😉

Because I haven't released an official new installer for a while, but development did continue. I believe there was an issue running that version fot the first time and believe I did update the installer but not sure I updated the zip file.... too long ago, The issue wast that some of the required tables are build initially at first start of tidy based on the autoit3 configfile present. Could it be it only shows a lot of debug message in the console the first time ran? If not i require a FILE to test with, not a cut & paste of the code, as the file contains the specific encoding! You could also simply download the lastest version of Tidy here and try that.

I need the input script to test against the latest version of tidy as I see you are using an old version of tidy.

Share a file that show this problem please,so I can test.

This seems to have been a bug in the SciTE 5.5.6 version as the 5.5.8 doesn't show this behavior anymore. Its now available in Beta SciTEx86.zip & SciTEx64.zip files.

EnvSet() and EnvUpdate() functions?

Guess it's related to running something with elevated rights? Care to share a script that has this issue?

updated...

@JPM, I would hold of on any process yet that requires your manual intervention, unless you have access to the svn hooks and can make it an automatic process. Let's first see the goal and then try to come up with a process that works preferably automated.

Great list of stuff to do, but I guess the "What" question needs to be answered before the "How". 🙂

So the only wish is to have access to the latest version of all standard UDFs to allow you to load the UDF's between releases, nothing else? UDF Helpfile updates maybe? I was under the impression it was more than that, but that could be me not reading the whole thing properly.

Wrong assumption again (partly) ! 😉 There are a couple of Dev's that have full access to the SVN like JPM&Myself, and there are a couple of members/MVPs/Mods that have access to the UDF part of the SVN library and can make the UDF modifications that get included in each release. You all have to figure out what it is you like to strive for like @WildByDesign mentioned. So define what it really is that you want without having the dependency on Jon or the core SVN library. Looking at the posts so far I see a lot of questions and not too many ideas on "process" so curious to see what the result will be of this exercise. 🙂

Why would a bridge be required? Just do your thing as user community and ignore what we do in the autoit3 svn. Keep life simple and maintain your own. I for one will root for you and wish you all a lot of wisdom in getting this workable.

That is clear so maybe don't respond with those lengthy brainwave dumps and first "Think-Research-Think again" before sharing those thoughts! 😉 I for one haven't read the whole thread and only rrad the post i responded to, as I am not the one that will be part of this effort. Github indeed has one owner for the repo but multiple people can be given the rights to approve pull requests and merge them into the repo.