ReMoTe04 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Hello! i have a question for you.. possible, to do an AutoIT script, for check the running programs, that editing a process memory? i need to do a script for check example, the calc.exe's memory, and the running programs that edit it.. if a runner program edit the calc.exe's memory, terminate it. posibble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Simple answer : no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Why do you need to do this? Please do not explain what you want - I want to know WHY you want it. The reason I ask is simple - usually there is a MUCH better reason than what you have in mind. Seeing how you are new, please make sure you know the forum rules before you answer. If what you have in mind goes against the forum rules, then no help will be provided. Understand we are happy to help however it has to be for a legit reason. The Vollatran project My blog: http://www.vollysinterestingshit.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unc3nZureD Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Sadly it's not likely to be possible. It requires hooking, DLLs, maybe a driver. Probably he wants to try to protect his or an other process from hacks. Any game relation is not allowed here, just to warn the OP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReMoTe04 Posted May 21, 2014 Author Share Posted May 21, 2014 I want to protect a multiplayer game with anticheat, but i cant program in c# or c++ because the cheats editing the game's memory, i want to breake it ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Why not simply use punkbuster for your game? The Vollatran project My blog: http://www.vollysinterestingshit.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 If you want to create an anti-cheat, drop your idea. For this you need to code in a langage which is directly compiled in assembly and have enough knowledge to know what cheats do (code injection/dllhook/...?). Plus there will be always someone to bypass it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unc3nZureD Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 If you want to create an anti-cheat, drop your idea. For this you need to code in a langage which is directly compiled in assembly and have enough knowledge to know what cheats do (code injection/dllhook/...?). Plus there will be always someone to bypass it. Well, sorry - I have to disagree. I don't think he should drop his idea. Just research more. Why do more and more games come alive? How could such anticheats like GameGuard or XTrap work? If you have such mentionality that why make it if anyone will crack it, that's a stupid idea. Just try to achive something better and better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 (edited) I wouldn't say it to everyone, he obviously knows nothing in programming so it will take a lot of time before he will be able to build a proper anti-cheat. Edited May 21, 2014 by FireFox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unc3nZureD Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 (edited) I started the same way I don't say I can still write a decent anticheat, but I'm on the way /btw, I'm programming for 4 years now.../ @ReMoTe04: 1 thing is sure. With Autoit, you can write such anticheat which can detect generic stuffs, like title, text or class. It's not that reliable, but not nothing I'm sure it's not for a commercial server, just a small private one - Later you have to move on C or C++. - You have to have a look at hooking, understand how executables work, etc. - Final step will be when you will be able to write a ring0 driver Well, I'm trying this one, but I don't think it will ever work. No way to sign it, and windows won't accept if you don't sign it. - Anyways remote Hooking or Global Hook is another nice idea too. This way you will need a DLL in any language with some detours (P.s.: Google helps a lot) The problem is that this can be used for bad purposes, like malware, this way it's mostly on the "black" side of the internet. You have to convert it to your own way Use it to defend, not to attack Be good. Edited May 21, 2014 by Unc3nZureD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now