Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, I am still using it. I am modifying the output as well, since I found it to be the best obfuscator available. 
So question: If I use Execute() with no variable, no UDFs in there, for example Execute(StringToBinary("Stringhere")) then it will still work right?
I tested it and it does work for me. Just want to make sure

And if the use of the good ol' obfuscator is disallowed, please delete this thread, staffs. Thanks.

  • Developers
Posted

There is no official Obfuscator and there has never been one, only the one I have supported, but that support has ended a while back.
Not sure why one still would want to use it. :) 

As to your question: Yes it will work as you already found out with your tests. 

Jos

SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource   Forum etiquette  Forum Rules 
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Posted
16 hours ago, Jos said:

There is no official Obfuscator and there has never been one, only the one I have supported, but that support has ended a while back.
Not sure why one still would want to use it. :) 

As to your question: Yes it will work as you already found out with your tests. 

Jos

 

Lel I still have the binary for version 1.0.30.1

If you still have the binary for a later version, please PM me the download. I wouldn't mind updating my protection toolkit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...