Jump to content
Au3Builder

Why Obfuscator is discontinued?

Recommended Posts

Au3Builder

Obfuscation offers a basic protection against decompilers.Do you plan to deliver another code protection in the future or do you know any software to make compiled programs more secure? If not,where can i get the latest version of obfuscator?

Edited by Au3Builder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jos
25 minutes ago, Au3Builder said:

Obfuscation offers a basic protection against decompilers.

No it doesn't and have explained that already too many times!

25 minutes ago, Au3Builder said:

Do you plan to deliver another code protection in the future or do you know any software to make compiled programs more secure?

No and the FAQ is pretty clear about it:  https://www.autoitscript.com/wiki/FAQ#How_can_I_protect_my_code_from_decompilation.3F

28 minutes ago, Au3Builder said:

If not,where can i get the latest version of obfuscator?

 https://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/scite/download/beta_SciTE4AutoIt3/discontinued/

Jos


SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource        Forum Rules
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Au3Builder

Thank you for giving me the link to download Obfuscator. As for " No it doesn't and have explained that already too many times! ". With all due respect but It does by bringing confusion to an average Joe's brain..it should take some time to solve the puzzle. By the way, there are paid code obfuscation solutions for javascript and NET platform. Do you consider them a scam? 

 

Edited by Au3Builder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iamtheky
3 hours ago, Au3Builder said:

By the way, there are paid code obfuscation solutions for javascript and NET platform. Do you consider them a scam?

The solution is literally included in the decompiled package, at best the implementation here was not even a mask, just a simple substitution.  

They may be named the same thing, but I'd imagine the comparisons end there.

Edited by iamtheky

,-. .--. ________ .-. .-. ,---. ,-. .-. .-. .-.
|(| / /\ \ |\ /| |__ __||| | | || .-' | |/ / \ \_/ )/
(_) / /__\ \ |(\ / | )| | | `-' | | `-. | | / __ \ (_)
| | | __ | (_)\/ | (_) | | .-. | | .-' | | \ |__| ) (
| | | | |)| | \ / | | | | | |)| | `--. | |) \ | |
`-' |_| (_) | |\/| | `-' /( (_)/( __.' |((_)-' /(_|
'-' '-' (__) (__) (_) (__)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jos
10 hours ago, Au3Builder said:

With all due respect but It does by bringing confusion to an average Joe's brain

Correct, so it doesn't give any extra security but merely makes the code harder to read.
Let's agree they are 2 totally different topics!

Jos


SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource        Forum Rules
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×