taurus905 Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 Can someone tell me why the following script outputs the wrong answer?If you input 1234567 in the first inputbox and 1 in the second inputbox the output is 1.23457e+006But in beta v3.1.1.127 the output was 1234566 (which was/is correct).I saw this at:http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.ph...st&p=136074Fixed : Conversion from floating point to string now shows less precision to prevent displaying unexpected values. (by Valik)I am not sure if that is what caused this problem, but I hope it will be fixed.Or better yet, I hope it is something I am overlooking.taurus905#include <GUIConstants.au3> GUICreate( "Subtraction Example", 300, 300, -1, -1, $WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW) $Seven_Digits = GuiCtrlCreateLabel("Seven Digit Number:", 60, 60, 100, 20) $Seven_Digits = GuiCtrlCreateInput("", 160, 55, 80, 20) $One_Digit = GuiCtrlCreateLabel("One Digit Number:", 60, 120, 100, 20) $One_Digit = GuiCtrlCreateInput("", 160, 115, 60, 20) $Subtract_Button = GUICtrlCreateButton("Subtract", 120, 160, 80, 30) GuiSetState(@SW_SHOW) While 1 $msg = GuiGetMsg() Select Case $msg = $GUI_EVENT_CLOSE ExitLoop Case $msg = $Subtract_Button $Result = GUICtrlRead($Seven_Digits) - GUICtrlRead($One_Digit) $lblResult = GuiCtrlCreateLabel("Result:", 60, 220, 100, 20) GuiCtrlCreateInput($Result, 160, 215, 100, 20) EndSelect WEnd Exit "Never mistake kindness for weakness."-- Author Unknown --"The highest point to which a weak but experienced mind can rise is detecting the weakness of better men."-- Georg Lichtenberg --Simple Obfuscator (Beta not needed.), Random names for Vars and Funcs
Developers Jos Posted July 9, 2006 Developers Posted July 9, 2006 (edited) Can someone tell me why the following script outputs the wrong answer?If you input 1234567 in the first inputbox and 1 in the second inputbox the output is 1.23457e+006But in beta v3.1.1.127 the output was 1234566 (which was/is correct).I saw this at:http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.ph...st&p=136074Fixed : Conversion from floating point to string now shows less precision to prevent displaying unexpected values. (by Valik)I am not sure if that is what caused this problem, but I hope it will be fixed.There is an issue in the 3.1.1.128 ..... will very likely be fixed/reverted in 3.1.1.129. Edited July 9, 2006 by JdeB SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page - Beta files Read before posting How to post scriptsource Forum etiquette Forum Rules Live for the present, Dream of the future, Learn from the past.
taurus905 Posted July 9, 2006 Author Posted July 9, 2006 There is an issue in the 3.1.1.128 ..... will very likely be fixed/reverted in 3.1.1.129.Thank you JdeB. That is good to know. "Never mistake kindness for weakness."-- Author Unknown --"The highest point to which a weak but experienced mind can rise is detecting the weakness of better men."-- Georg Lichtenberg --Simple Obfuscator (Beta not needed.), Random names for Vars and Funcs
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now