tcp by internet

[zeroZshadow 0]

where here is the thing

i base64 encode a 300kb file, so it'll become larger, but sendable

next i send about 200 characters per packet.

but it still takes about 1 or 2 minutes for the reciever to get the file by internet.

maby anyone knows a better way to get file ready for transmission ?

Edited August 8, 2006 by zeroZshadow

[evilertoaster 4]

Humm, why are you base64 encoding it?

Anyways i just send the whole thing at once and recive it, it usaully doesnt matter what the packet size is in my experiance but i think i use 10,000 or somthing.

You can look here for my a snippet from my file send/rec script to see for yourself-

http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=26539

[themax90 2]

That shows the simple restrictions of file uploading. It's most likely your ISP has an upload limit of 20kb/s.

[zeroZshadow 0]

i see that repnull stuff, but isn't there a simple and clean UDF for ??

since i think its pretty unclear

[evilertoaster 4]

That shows the simple restrictions of file uploading. It's most likely your ISP has an upload limit of 20kb/s.

Was that at me? dont' get it....

i see that repnull stuff, but isn't there a simple and clean UDF for ??

since i think its pretty unclear

I have never understood the issue with the repnull stuff...i have never had that problem.

[zeroZshadow 0]

i have an upload speed of 50kb/s like my friend.

but still 20 kb/s should be more then enough to send that file fast.

wadda ya mean evil toaster ??? u do know u can't send files with NULL chars in it, do ya ?

Edited August 8, 2006 by zeroZshadow

[evilertoaster 4]

wadda ya mean evil toaster ??? u do know u can't send files with NULL chars in it, do ya ?

Why not?.... i've been sending files with that filesender i posted all the time with no problems.

[zeroZshadow 0]

wtf ?? i thought it wasn't possible to send null chars :|

[zeroZshadow 0]

nvm, stupid post

Edited August 8, 2006 by zeroZshadow

[evilertoaster 4]

It checks if the demetions are SMALLER than $i+$z...it would have to be LARGER for it to have at least that many (and then +1 for 'fence post' errors)

Edited August 8, 2006 by evilertoaster

[zeroZshadow 0]

jup, just found out, stupid post