ASCII verses Unicode

[pekster 0]

If you run the included example AutoIt code below, you can see that the @CRLF macro is 1 byte per character, and the equivilent using the Asc function is 2 bytes per character. Why are we combining strict ASCII and unicode characters in these results? Shouldn't they be equivalent commands? If not, you could run into some very odd problems by assuming the output from these commands will be in the same format. This could be rather dangerous for some filetypes.

Code illustrating the problem:

<code removed>

Okay, I was stupid and mixed up my Chr and Asc commands

It is all strict ASCII. Sorry for the bother.

Edited July 6, 2004 by pekster