Timer

[Snook]

Ok using the Sleep Function and by using this code

$begin = TimerInit()
sleep(3000)
$dif = TimerDiff($begin)
MsgBox(0,"Time Difference",$dif)
oÝ÷ ÚØ^¶)ÉèµìZrׯz¼­g¢²Ø^­ë(ìÈ­jj+zÞr+¶)¢áȬ­"¯zz0Y«#ºËp¢w^®'íêÞË(ëaxq©Ý¢ØZ¶Éè¶Ú¢je{¬+®*mx,)e±ªÞ)¢µçZºÚ"µÍÌÍØÚXÚÜÝ[HH^[ÚXÚÜÝ[J
ÍË

Í
ÎK

ÍBÚ[H ÌÍØÚXÚÜÝ[HH^[ÚXÚÜÝ[J
ÍË

Í
ÎK

ÍBTÛY
L
BÑ[[ÝÙS[ÝJLK
L
BÌÍØYÚ[H[Y[]

BÛY
JBÌÍÙYH[YY   ÌÍØYÚ[B^U
    ][ÝÕ[YI][ÝË ÌÍÙY
JBÙ[
    ][ÝÐI][ÝÊ

[xcal]

I'm only getting a variation of about 0 to .007 of a second. Exactly how accurately do you need it to be??

[Snook]

I worte down a few times it showed from my script

109.-----

81.------

86.-----

128.----

76.----

I was just thinking it was affecting it for what I'm trying to do.

[SmOke_N]

Stands to reason the time would not be exact every time. It takes time to move through the interpreter and depends on how fast/memory/and processes are using your system resources are at the moment you are running things.

You also need to divide your returns by 1000 to get the proper value:

Time = 0.00232739077173205

Time = 0.023152942622596

Time = 0.0118596078551882

Time = 0.00925424879419046

Time = 0.00302775911463593

Time = 0.0273518002986415

Time = 0.003409930591737

Time = 0.0111634299890069

Time = 0.0159710242502888

Time = 0.0063630992207111

Average Difference = 0.0113881233508728

1/100th of a second difference... not too shabby.

You can run the test for yourself:

ConsoleWrite(@LF)
Global $iCount = 0, $iAdd = 0, $nHold = ''
While $iCount < 10
    $begin = TimerInit()
    Sleep(3000)
    $dif = TimerDiff($begin)
    ConsoleWrite('Time = ' & (($dif / 1000) - 3) & @CRLF)
    $nHold &= (($dif / 1000) - 3) & Chr(1); Create a string that can be made into an array/Subtract the 3 seconds for sleep
    $iCount += 1
WEnd
$nHold = StringSplit(StringTrimRight($nHold, 1), Chr(1))
For $iCC = 1 To UBound($nHold) - 1
    $iAdd += ($nHold[$iCC] / (UBound($nHold) - 1))
Next
ConsoleWrite('Average Difference = ' & $iAdd & @LF)

[Shevilie]

My guess would be your PixelChecksum(637, 474, 639, 476) thats taking the time, though its a small area.... (Only a guess)

[BALA]

Really, I don't think AutoIt is fast enough to get/use the times correctly in sync

Sort of why I gave up trying to program an All-Purpose Autoer in AutoIt.

Now C, that's a different story

Edited January 6, 2007 by BALA

[SmOke_N]

Really, I don't think AutoIt is fast enough to get/use the times correctly in sync

Sort of why I gave up trying to program an All-Purpose Autoer in AutoIt.

Now C, that's a different story

That's apparent.