Iklim Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Hi all,This is my first post here so dont blame me I just want to know if i m doing something like it should be doneor if there is another way to do this faster.So in short, i first scan an area for something changing (using pixelchecksum) and if i find anything changing,i need to know EXACTLY where it is changing.So my approach is like this :then when i have 3 areas which contains my 'changing things' i do a union (AND) of all of them (or at least the last 2) and check every squareto finally find EXACTLY what is changing.Basically another way to do this is to simply check every single square after a succesful first big scan.So my question is, will my approach be less consumming (statistically) than the most basic approach (checking every square after the first scan) ?Or, is there another way to do this faster ?hope i am clear enough.thanks in advance for any reply.--Iklim Iklim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now