Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

about RichEdit without a3l - would it interest anybody?

Recommended Posts



I have "worked" a little on some functions (I would say - made some changes),

so that they they don't need a3l any more. You can make basic text formating

with (3.2.12). Is it a problem or is it needed to post them here?

Some remarks:


I didn't get to "translate" the dllcallbackfree to the new function (would somebody help me?)

I'm still trying to get it to work.


I don't know if it's a problem that theese were (or are) functions from a3lRichedit of arcker (from a post here),

I adapted some of them so that they are usable without a3l under 3.2.12.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this