KJohn Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 I thought that once the tokenized compilation scheme was introduced our scripts would be slightly more secure. I was under the false impression that it would (at least) be harder for others to decompile scripts now. It's pretty annoying to find that within 2 minutes (searching, downloading and running), a script that took years to write (literally) could be fully decompiled into a recompilable form. Is there any plan in the works for an even more secure system?
Valik Posted June 18, 2008 Posted June 18, 2008 Of course not. In fact, the next step is to add a way for people to easily view your script without putting any effort at all into it. That is of course sarcasm. Really, did you need to create a topic on this subject for the 500th time? Locking yet another pointless topic on the same subject.
Administrators Jon Posted June 18, 2008 Administrators Posted June 18, 2008 I thought that once the tokenized compilation scheme was introduced our scripts would be slightly more secure. I was under the false impression that it would (at least) be harder for others to decompile scripts now. It's pretty annoying to find that within 2 minutes (searching, downloading and running), a script that took years to write (literally) could be fully decompiled into a recompilable form.Is there any plan in the works for an even more secure system?People need to understand that unless we make a compiled script ask for a password every time it is executed then someone can create a decompiler.
Recommended Posts