Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

I was using version 3.2.8.1 - and thought that perhaps i should upgrade to 3.3.0.0.

I got the zip version, so i could check out scripts before committing, and I'm suddenly seeing a problem with WinWaitActive

In 3.2.8.1 it returns true as soon as the window appears and goes active, but in 3.3.0.0 it returns 0 always.

What could I have overlooked? I saw something about all strings now being unicode, could that be it? (Not that I actually understand the difference between the unicode and ascii in this context)

I never changed the default match mode, so that should still be "Matches partial titles from the start" right?

Posted

This is to vague. Post a replication script showing your issue.

Jos

Seems either the syntax changed or you can't have [title] and [class] at the same time, one or the other is fine. Both fails.

if WinWaitActive("[TITLE:name][CLASS:Afx:400000:3:10011:0:0]", "",20)=0 then
        MsgBox(0,"","Failed")
endif
  • Developers
Posted

Have you checked the helpfile?

It contains all information about release chnages and the proper syntax:

WinWaitActive("[TITLE:My Window; CLASS:My Class; INSTANCE:2]", "")

SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource   Forum etiquette  Forum Rules 
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Posted

Yes, then I came here.

Guess the one I should have extrapolated from was: "Fixed #562: Specifying the TITLE property caused all other properties to be lost "

  • Developers
Posted

Guess the one I should have extrapolated from was: "Fixed #562: Specifying the TITLE property caused all other properties to be lost "

The proper syntax is clearly listed in the Helpfile ... agree? (That is what I quoted in my reply)

Jos

SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource   Forum etiquette  Forum Rules 
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Posted

Sure, but since it has always been working I didn't think there was something wrong there and had syntax blindess. So quoting didn't really help as much as "your syntax is wrong" would have.

But this answers my questions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...