WebDriver UDF (W3C compliant version) - 2024/09/21

[Danp2]

  On 1/22/2018 at 9:53 AM, NguyenLe said:

How do I check if a alert appear?

Expand  

Check out the latest revisions to _WDAlert, which can be found here. Once properly tested, I'll merge into the main branch. 

[NguyenLe]

  On 1/23/2018 at 2:40 PM, Danp2 said:

Check out the latest revisions to _WDAlert, which can be found here. Once properly tested, I'll merge into the main branch. 

Expand  

I can not get text of alert

It return a empty string

[Danp2]

@NguyenLe It works in my testing. Show your code.

P.S. Merged code yesterday, so the prior link is now invalid. 

[Danp2]

Updated to v0.1.0.3

https://github.com/Danp2/WebDriver/releases/latest

[Danp2]

Added _WD_LinkClickByText. Please review / comment on coding here --

https://github.com/Danp2/WebDriver/commit/d9ad49353264c5729f27ef78d7bece70aa3cf5da

 

[mLipok]

You start not consistent naming convention.

_WD_xxxx
_WDxxx

Personaly I prefer first way, as in this convention first part is related to UDF name with separation from FunctionName.

IMHO:
_UDFNAME_FunctionName  is much more readable then _UDFNAMEFunctionName 

 

Edited January 25, 2018 by mLipok

[Danp2]

I was initially using the second method for the "core" functions. When I started developing the "helper" functions, I switched to the other method.

I can easily add the underscore to those where it is missing, and now would be the best time since we are early in the development process.

[mLipok]

I apologize for my level of not knowing about GitHub.
I have a problem - I want to do FORK but I have a message:

  Quote

You don’t have permission to fork to these organizations:

AutoIt

Expand  

I know that I'm part of this organization on GitHub but.... I think I should be able to make fork to my own GitHub account.

What I'm doing wrong ?

 

Edited January 25, 2018 by mLipok

[Danp2]

Not sure TBH. Who is the owner of "Autoit" on GH? Perhaps you don't have the authority to create a fork under this identify. 

You could try logging in with your own personal account.

P.S. I can add you to my repository if you would like to submit things directly to it.

[mLipok]

  On 1/25/2018 at 3:42 PM, Danp2 said:

Updated to v0.1.0.3

https://github.com/Danp2/WebDriver/releases/latest

Expand  

With all due respect, but the licensing method creates a problem.
"Disclose source"

Not everyone who creates scripts, using this UDF, will want to share the source of their program.

For example, me.

So I want to ask
Whether is it possible to change the license for less restrictive in this respect (if I remember correctly, MIT is more flexible).

 

[Danp2]

@mLipok Honestly, it doesn't matter to me. However, I think one of us is misinterpreting the requirements of GNU GPLv3. Please review this link and then get back to me.

[mLipok]

AutoIt as well as its standard UDF allow you to create programs without having to show the entire script to the end user.
But if anyone make the program using any snippet licensed on GPL3.0 then the entire program is also GPL3.
This means that if the end customer wants you to provide him with the source code in the form of AU3 files, then you must share them.

Ultimately, this may result in a diminishing popularity of AutoIt.
Or vice versa.
The greater the number of UDFs available with less restrictive licenses, ultimately increases the number of potential opportunities, using AutoIt in the business sphere.

 

[Danp2]

I'm still not clear on the definition of "disclose source". I would interpret this to mean that source for the UDF and any derivatives would need to be provided. To me, this would not include the source code for programs or scripts that directly call the GPL'd code.

After further research, it appears that you are correct. I will switch the licensing over to MIT.

[mLipok]

Thanks.

btu...

Currently here
https://github.com/Danp2/WebDriver/blob/0.1.0.3/LICENSE

you have information about both license.

 

Edited January 26, 2018 by mLipok

[Danp2]

I believe that is because you are looking at the code at a prior release level. The latest revision can be seen here.

Haven't checked to see if I can modify or remove the prior releases.

[mLipok]

Looks good

 

[Danp2]

Added _WD_LinkGetCollection. Please review / comment on coding here --

https://github.com/Danp2/WebDriver/commit/826f953baa6c33231df5223857774a01985ae0c9

[Danp2]

  On 1/26/2018 at 11:53 PM, Danp2 said:

_WD_LinkGetCollection

Expand  

Trying to think this through and wondering if we really need separate functions for gathering sets of links, tables, images, etc.

Anyone care to share their opinion on this?

[NguyenLe]

Your UDF is more fluent. I like it very much.

congratulate on!!!

[Jury]

Sorry, I'm probably just being dense but where is the webdriver.au3?

I've got these but can't find the : webdriver.au3 anywhere or do I rename wd_core?

wd_core.au3
wd_helper.au3
wd_test.au3
geckodriver.exe
BinaryCall.au3
Json.au3

Edited January 27, 2018 by Jury
addition